Quote
This interpritation has nothing to do with Jewish apocrypha or the talmud and midrash
I didn't say it did.. Read my post I said not all early Jewish literature was considered inspired by God, and gave the apocrypha as an example. I was making a general point.

Quote
As for the strict policy well you are wrong , do some research about for example the story of the adultress woman found in John 8 , this story as agreed upon by all historians
I'm sorry but why are you bringing the Gospels into the equation? We are talking of the Jewish Torah are we not... Christians know quite well what was added to the Gospels and can give a pretty good idea of when it occurred. That's why your post about the ending of Mark which seems to have perturbed you some what has not been addressed.. It's old news.

Quote
I am not talking about one or two scholars , I am talking about the major concensus of the biblical interpritors , there is a difference.

When some author writes an article to change and twist the interpritations of a clear passage ; a change which contradicts all the previous established meaning of the clear text , just in order to avoid muslim objections on the bible!!!! That my dear friend is a bias interpritation which makes it false !!!!!
numbers are immaterial unless you are simply going to go with the consensus of opinion I guess. Allow me to share another observation on books with you... All books or articles written to an audience are can never be truly unbiased... The author will always have his/her agenda. Target audience..profit.. Or simply making a name for themselves on the stage of academia. You will obviously favour articles which support your view, it's clear from an earlier post you made in relation to the linage of the prophet of Islam where you gave some websites for reference.. You said two were from Christian sources.. They were not. I can only guess in your quest to prove your point you chose what you thought were Christian and yay.. Point proven. Nada.. You do the same with Bible verses.. Using them out of context when you feel they prove your point.. Yet Nada.. They do not... And so do nothing to prove your point, except maybe to fellow muslims.

Quote
You revert to defaming the other part in order to ignore the response !!


Sorry to disappoint you but You have proved nothing !!! nor have you debunked anything!!!!


I mean hebrew literiture applies to jewish appocrypha in this passage !!!! Really another claim which you cannot back up


Gill's exposition and pulpit commentary and the other christian interpritors do not matter !!!!


Words of god means interpritation of the words !!!!


Really this is the bases of your arguments !!!


As a librarian you should have known better , but you answered in such a way which really was not fair to your own argument
I am sorry to say but it was you who refuted your own argument.


Peace unto you may god guide you to the truth
you have pretty much misunderstood everything I have posted. I think we are done here.. Don't you?

Peace unto you also.