Moreover, when he got informed of the murdering of his teacher and baptizer, Yehia PBUH, we find him, as scribers of gospels mention as well, heading to the wilderness with his disciples uncaringly as they spent there sometime eating and drinking light-heartedly not shedding a tear as if nothing happened! Above all, the devil got so gluttonous in tempting him, so he led him here and there and kept moving him from the top of the mountain to the middle of the wilderness to the top of the temple demanding him to perform so and so of such strange demands contradictory to faith which the Christians call a trial of the devil for him! How by God would Satan be that gluttonous for him? I wonder if the father of devils got so aged that he no more could discern visuals and he no longer could see that he was dealing with God Himself not with a human being! How that God did not warn him and say to him: O fellow, retain a grain of salt in your face (i.e. have or show some good manners, this is a shameful behaviour and is not becoming of you to act like this”? Then He would slap him (Satan) on the face causing his eyes to glow flamingly exploding out of anger. Only then he (Satan) would know God indeed and would never repeat this again. Rather, how he (God) obeyed the father of devils and followed him wherever he took him and wherever he led him? Rather, how did PBUH assert that he did not come to contradict the faith? Then he would attack the religion immediately scribing this legislation or that of these legislations brought by Moses? All this is known for who read the gospels. It was not we Muslims who said this; rather, it was the scribers of the New Testament. Before all this, he, PBUH contradicted greatly the basis of his religion, its essence and the axis upon which it revolves when his enemies placed him on the cross according to what was stated in the Gospels not what we Muslims believe in as the Christians believe that he (PBUH) had come to salvage all mankind (all mankind not merely children of Israel about whom he repeatedly mentioned that he had come only for them and in order to teach them neither to repent their sins nor anything at all of the sort). However, we find him panicking and filled with worry and sorrow; furthermore, on the cross he screamed and shrieked asking for help but there is no help indicating that he forgot his mission for which he had been sent to the Earth or at least he could not rise to its standard. This means that his behaviour did not conform to what he preached. If we should add to this what Christians said about his deism, we would know that the catastrophe is more devastating and worse. As this means that this god is too weak to avoid such error while he was the one who created among all that he created error and he could have avoided committing this error. This is in addition to being so feeble that he could not tolerate torture and pain while he was the one who created among all that he created torture and pain. He would have saved himself of feeling this torture and pain. If gods would err, feel pain and torture at the hands of whom? The hands of criminals of their creatures! How I wonder?! By the way, there were people among the ancestors of Muslims and their successors who confronted this kind of torture and tolerated it and were their victims without making a big fuss about it like this from their fellows and beloved!
By the way as well we would not have liked to draw such a comparison, we think that the holy messenger would not be pleased by such talk, if …. Yes, if some Christians challenge Muslims by such comparison! We find for example this book, at hand here, published in the different Christian websites. In addition, some shredded priests provoke us in their websites messages to answer him and the like with the impertinent recklessness in obscenity of the holy messenger person. If the scribers of this book (this is a true testimony) are too careful not to descend to this rotten abyss, and this is what we feel grateful for them and its effect appears in our reply to them as the readers must have noticed. Therefore, we have to answer such provocations and challenges every now and then so that the readers, who are not completely aware of all aspects, do not think that it is a difficult challenge while they themselves see that there is no kind of difficulty despite the embarrassment I felt for what pain I unintentionally caused some Christian friends who correspond with us and with whom we share mutual kindness because this talk may have a bad effect on them no matter how broad their hearts and minds are. However, we depend on, despite this, their good judgment for the attack against the master of messengers, the prophet (PBUH) has become occupying the minds of each jobless bastard especially the shredded priest who floods me every while with varieties of books challenging me to respond to all of them. Whenever I refute some of what he sends of absurdities and obscurities and did not leave him a **** linked to another over tens of pages in an unequivocal crucial logic, he would simply say without bothering himself to answer anything of what we have written: let’s leave this and move to another, or that what I have written does not convince me like this, very briefly in only a few words, and that was the end of that, …. And nothing could be done about it.
We would like these friends to forgive us and do not think that we are fond of hurting them; rather, we only wish to answer some of these challenges we have pointed out, only some that we feel would compensate for the rest and not all. Otherwise, we will not finish writing and talking and we will not be able despite this to cover not even one of thousand of what provocations that are raised. In addition, the other party does not bother himself to answer what we say and if he does, he would resort to lying, defamation, manipulation of stories. He does not interpret in detail as we do so that we leave no gaps in the subject without covering them; hence, they do not remain wide open like the blistered buttock of the priest! My greetings to you, priest!

تعليق