Despite this fraud case of interpretations and revealing the inherent corruption in Christianity and their agreement with the Jews upon a single book i.e. the Old Testament. Each of them interprets it according to their whims and each of them worship a god contradicting to the other… and this we are not considering it at the moment.
However, I wanted to explain that the Bible or one of its co ntents, the Genesis Book, reveals that it did not discuss the zero moment which started by the creation of the skies and the earth. Rather, the Genesis Book started by the emergence of the skies and the earth and we do not know how they were created. This would make us refer to what I have mentioned before that the Bible provided us the faith that the skies and the earth are eternal and not created. Whoever objects to us, we say to him: provide us with the evidence and tell us where is it stated in the Genesis Book how the skies and earth were created, while the beginning of the Genesis Book described how the earth was void and the Priest Antonious Fekry said that the earth was sunk under waters.
Thus, which was created first: the skies, the earth or the waters? Which the egg or the hen?
Hence, when we refer to the scientific theories, we must not involve the Bible in such matters for the alienation of its t exts from the zero point in which the creation of the skies and the earth started. History witnesses that the church in Middle Ages fought and condemned scientists, including Galileo and other, through the inspection courts, the industrial revolution, the French Revolution and secularism. Thus, the church was separated from the state which had a great impact on the prosperity of knowledge and scientific progress.
If the bible had had the secret or the key which helped scientists to get to the secret of the universe creation, the Christian philosopher Emanuel Kant and the Christian Carl Marx and the Christian Fredrick Angels would not have asserted the idea of the eternity of the universe and the inexistence of a moment denoting its beginning. In addition, the Christian Einstein would not have added a universal constant for his equations to make its resultant answers correct. Astronomers have confirmed that the universe is constant and there is no other way to make their equations conform to such model. Years later, Einstein admitted that this universal constant which he added was the gravest error he committed in his works.
If the Bible had had a path or a thread that would make scientists attain their discoveries, they would have credited them to the Bible even by a suggestion.
One of the cross people , followers of the Jews would jump saying that the first chapter of the Genesis Book reveals for us the steps or phases of the creation of the skies as mentioned in :
سفر تكوين 1: 6
و قال الله ليكن جلد في وسط المياه و ليكن فاصلا بين مياه و مياه .... و دعا الله الجلد سماء و كان مساء و كان صباح يوما ثانيا .
1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
سفر تكوين 1: 14
و قال الله لتكن انوار في جلد السماء لتفصل بين النهار و الليل و تكون لايات و اوقات و ايام و سنين
1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
I would like to say to whoever is driven to discuss these two editions that they are against you rather than for you… how?
Please pay more attention and concentrate more, the priest Antonious says:
سفر التكوين 1: 1
في البدء خلق الله السموات و الارض
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth
Bolus, the messenger, indicates that he was taken to the third sky and the three skies:-
1) the first : sky for birds and has a layer of air
2) the second: sky for the planets and both the first and second sky are material skies
3) the third: the spiritual sky in which the glory of God will be announced and it has the lodgings of the angels and the throne of God and the heritage of saints who live with God.
The word sky in general points to whatever rise and ascend. The first and second material skies are the ones which will disappear with the earth to form a new sky and a new earth. Of course, the third spiritual sky would not vanish. However, why did not the book disclose anything about the creation of the skies:-
(1) 1The words in the book is addressed to mankind who would not understand what relates to the skies and this what the Christ meant in his talk with Nikodimous )John 3:12)
(2) Bolus himself could not describe what is in the sky, so he said: ”what no eye saw nor ear heard about” because the language of the heaven is completely different from that of mankind on earth.
God created the sky before the earth was created:
(1) The sky was stated before the earth in this verse.
(2) The angels, morning planets chanted when the earth was created refer to 38:1
(3) The word skies here refer to the creation of the angels, tehn the planets in their courses… the priest speech ended.
Here the priest proved to us that the Genesis Book did not discuss the creation of the skies and was satisfied with what he mentioned in the first edition of the first chapter.
Firstly: the greatest catastrophe is that they believed Bolus in his saying that the skies are three, while the whole Bible did not deal in this respect. Therefore, where did Bolus got these numbers? There is no answer; however, a genius would say that the revelation is the one who told him; as if the revelation bestowed Bolus only with this piece of information and did not tell Moses whom no woman in Bani Israel in whole gave birth to someone like him.
Secondly, it was stated in the Book :
سفر التكوين 1: 1
في البدء خلق الله السموات و الارض
And the skies are three as Bolus said. The paragraph merely states that God created the skies and the earth and that is it. It is evidenced that in the second paragraph, he said the earth was void and this means that the solid mass of the earth was created; in addition, this paragraph reveals that the three skies were created and that is it.
How then were the three skies created as it was given in the plural form (skies) while the first chapter mentioned that the first sky was created on the second day and the second sky was created on the fourth? However, the creation of the thirds sky was not mentioned.
أَوَلَمْ يَرَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقًا فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاء كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ أَفَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ
[الأنبياء30]
Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one united piece, then we parted them? And we have made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? (surate al-Anbiaa- Verse 30)
The discoveries of Hable Observatory led to the fact of the extended universe for the emergence of another model that was essential so that no chaos would happen. In order to make his equations correct, if the universe is enlarging and growing with the passage of time, then this would mean that turning backwards would lead us to a smaller universe. Thus, if we go more backwards (to a great extent) everything would shrink and converge towards a single point. The result which can be achieved of this is that at some time, the matter of the whole universe was compressed in a single point mass which has a volume of a zero due to the point power of the zero size. This explosion that occurred is called the great explosion.
In 1989, George Smott and hi teamwork in NASA sent an artificial tracer to the space and they called it the universal back radiation detector (cobe). Eight minutes were sufficient to assure the results which Kilman Benzias and Wilson attained. These final crucial results confirmed the existence of a thing that has a thick and hot form that protects against the great explosion by which the universe emerged to existence. Scientists decided that this detector could take and captivate the remains of the great explosion successfully.
In addition, to the theory of the great explosion, there is some important evidence represented in the quantity of the hydrogen and helium gases in the universe. The observatory indicated that the combination of these two elements in the universe was conforming to the theoretical calculations of what may remain of them after the great explosion. This led to hitting a hedge to the core of the constant state theory. If the universe existed and was eternal and had no beginning, this would mean that the hydrogen gas would have burnt and turned into helium gas.
Due to all these evidence, the theory of the great explosion won almost complete approval by the scientific communities. In an article published in 1944 in the American Science Magazine, it was stated that the great explosion model is the only capable one to justify the constant expansion of the universe; in addition it explains the observed results.
Dennis Siema defence of the constant state theory went for long supporting in this Fred Hoyle; however, when he confronted the great explosion evidence, he described this dilemma by saying: “at the beginning I sided with Hoyle, but when this evidence started growing, I had to accept that the game ended and the constant state theory must be nullified”
For further information refer to: https://www.falal.ae/k6.htm
The bible is only good for thighs, navel, breast, pomegranates, bunches of grapes, prostitution, sex, homosexuality, killing, blood spilling, sanctioning killing of virgins, presenting human sacrifices as immolations to the lord of the Old Testament and the perfume of prostitutes to massage the body of Jesus to satisfy his desires and increase his sexual excitement.As for science and scientists, the Koran supports them and urges them to pursue because all will refer to the words of God in it.
doc uments science
Diplomatic
William Campbell says :
Dr. Bukai assumes that the doc uments’ theory of the origin and evolution of the Taurat is correct. This theory evolved in its final form in 1890. we can say that disbelieving in miracles and prophecy is the basis of this theory. Dr. Bukai quoted the views of some catholic theologians who believe in this theory and I do not confirm that they deny the possibility of miracles’ occurrence. I agree with Dr. Bukai in his anger at some of the church men, Catholic and protestant, who quoted the words of Moses and the Christ for the people of the church as if they believe in the revelation while they write the juristic research which deny the revelation! I reject the theory of doc uments.
Here we find William Campbell escaping the picture in order to prove the validity of the Bible. He accused the catholic and the protestant of atheism and this is not the end of the journey. It is known since the Khalkidonia assembly in 451 that the assembly accused the Alexandria Church of heresy because they called with faith that Jesus has one nature and has no two natures. Thus, Descorous, Alexandria pope, was deposed and was expelled because he was following the Otakhi heresy. The orthodox became a Christian heresy such as Nastour and others. The orthodox sect still fights other sects. The challenge still goes on and would never end because what was established on deception is a falsity.





تعليق