Proof of The Preservation of the Quran

[فداء الرسول]

http://www.ebnmaryam.com/vb/t199965.html

[Burninglight]

Quote

http://www.ebnmaryam.com/vb/t199965.html

You are not addressing any of the question I asked. I didn't ask why Uthman burned the Qurans. I read the information you sent, but it speaks of memorization but doesn't mention that those that memorize the Quran were killed in the battle of Yamama nor does it address the fact that Utman didn't depend on memory; instead he used the help of text and that text was destroyed. As I mentioned, you didn't mention why Hafsa's copy was destroyed after Uthman used the help of text from her copy. Wouldn't this leave an element of doubt as to why it was found necessary to destroy her copy when Uthman used it to recompile the Quran? We cannot check her copy to see if it all lines up with Uthman's recompilation, because of its destruction. As I mentioned again, this proves to me that you cannot prove unequivocally the perfect preservation of the Quran. I can see this element of doubt unless you can explain why Marwa destroyed her copy after Uthman used it to standardize the Quran after Islam's prophet's death and after his wife's death. You need to explain this; otherwise, there is a big hole in your explanation. Finally, you didn't address who gave the divine mandate to put the Quran to writing when it means recite and not write! God promised the Scripture that came before was established secure in heaven before the Quran; so, why does the Quran contradict the Scripture God promised was established forever before Islam's prophet's birth...
These questions need to be addressed before you can claim proof of the preservation of the Quran

Your articles state the following:
One original copy ONLY in the original language dating to the time of the respective prophet or very close to his time. IT DATES TO HIS TIME BUT THAT DOESN'T PROOF ANYTHING

2. The original manuscripts should not contain any variances or contradictory accounts of the same events. GO ON LINE AND PLUG IN CONTRADICTIONS IN THE QURAN

3. All verses in such manuscripts or books should be accepted by the followers of the respective religion. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN WHEN IT COMES TO THE SHIA, SUNNI AND THE QURANIST

4. The book should not contain any errors pertaining to any subject in light of the used language, the traditions of the people of the time or the fulfillment of any prophecies in such books. IT DID UNTIL UTHMAN PUT IT IN THE QURASH LANGUAGE

5. Most importantly, the book should not produce any doctrines that contradict its own contents. AGAIN AND GO ONLINE PLUG IN CONTRADICTIONS OF CONTIENT IN THE QURAN

6. The book should include the message of God only as conveyed by the respective prophets and not doctrines or teachings of humans who are supposed to be followers of the prophets. THE PEOPLE ARE SUPPOSED TO JUDGE IF THE PROPHETS ARE FROM GOD AND NOT BELIEVE THEM ALL. THERE IS SUCH THING AS FALSE PROPHETS FROM THE TIME OF MOSES AND TO DATE. MOREOVER PROPHETS ARE HHUMAN. ANYONE WHO THINKS THAT ARE SUPER HUMAN OR BETTER THAN HUMAN ARE COMMITTING A SIN OF IDOLATRY

7. A divine book revealed by God will glorify and call for the worship of God Almighty in simple and straight forward verses that do not require an IBM super computer to decipher. A divine book would not call for the worship of humans, idols or symbols in any form. I AGREE

8. A divine book from God cannot represent God [forbid] as a racist or blood thirsty god! I'm sure that you agree that God's love and mercy are for all who worhsip him alone and obey his commands I AGREE. JESUS DEATH ON THE CROSS WAS NOT A BLOOD THIRSTY ACT, BUT AN ACT OF LOVE GREATER THAN THE WORLD HAS EVER KNOWN.