QuoteOriginally Posted by huria
Huria, if you read my post above I started with an apology for the copy and paste.. I added the website link at the bottom. They are not my words.. And I never stated that I share the same opinion expressed in the article. I stand by what I said.. I personally do not see the need to use the Quran in support of the Bible.. The Quran may need the Bible, as we see many of the stories are similar and some of the Biblical Prophets are to be found in the Quran, or at least an approximation of them. As the Bible came first then I don't see how or why it would be necessary for an earlier Scripture to need support from a later one. I see you are no stranger to copy and paste yourself so I don't see where the problem lies.
For sure this is your opinion or one shared by you. I can respect that even though I do not share it. I have replied to your posts on the other threads but they have not been posted yet. I am starting to see it may be futile to enter into dialogue with you.. I do not think you have anything. If you have to use such websites as answering this or that or whatever then that sets the tone and it's one I particularly wish to pursue.QuoteIn short to answer your claim, with the verses you used from the Qurn, The verses from the Qur'an, which command the Jews and Christians to judge by the Torah and Gospel respectively actually means that they must judge by the Qur'an since this is the only way to really judge by the Torah and Gospel sent to Moses and Jesus peace be upon them both respectively.
· 2:285 “The Messenger believes in what has been sent down to him from Lord, and [so do] believers; everyone believes in God and His angels, His books and His messengers. We do not differentiate between any His messengers.”
The noble verse described the muslims as the ones who believed in God and His angels, His books and His messengers but are the prophets before Mohamed still alive in persons? no.
it means we believe in them as they WERE prophets ,and it is not conditional that they must be alive in order to believe in them...
· not only is the case of the prophets but the case of the scripture itself, it is not conditional in order to believe in a revelation ,that it must be present fully as it was originally revealed ,eg;
Holy Quran: SAY: "We believe in God and what has been sent down to us, and what was sent down to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and their descendants, and what was given Moses and Jesus, and what was given the [other] prophets by their Lord.
what was sent down to Abraham? no scrolls of Abraham survive till today ,yet the Quran described the muslims as they already believed in that scroll....... so how that could be?!
That is the short answer for long answer you can read this,
http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/re...eir_scriptures
and this
http://www.answering-christianity.co...?topic=1155.15
I doubt you will do though !
I will make it easy for you. You can just answer one query... Which you kind of boasted that you could do so... So it should not be difficult. Before I ask the question I would like to respectfully ask that first and foremost you are honest with yourself and also honest in your intentions in regards to dialogue. To bear in mind that although you hold no respect for the Bible it is my Holy Book. I accord the Quran respect not because I believe it is what it claims to be... But because you and millions of muslims do hold it as your Holy Scripture and as such all Gods words need to be accorded the same respect.
my question.. Feel free to start another thread if needs be.. Is.....
who corrupted the Bible text? Name and shame please. When was this done? And why was it thought to be necessary to change the word of God in the first place?
I await your reply.
also this post seems to have some issue with the font size.. It has suddenly changed to a minuscule font. I hope a moderator can adjust this if not I hope you can see the font to read it.
Peace.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks