You are not exactly correct here. The concept was always there, but the term trinity wasn't always there. it wasn't coined until the Roman empire made Christianity the official religion.
Of course, we all agree that God is in control; therefore, God allowed it to be the official religion of the world, only Satan doesn't like the idea; so, he comes up with cults, false prophets and people who twist Scriptures or use semantics to show Biblical corruption, but they are still met with defeat as Christianity is still the world dominant religion even though there are many misguided nominal Christians as there are to be expected, but it still dominates, and God is in control and allows it.
This is not to say that the dominate religion is the truth for that reason, but it turns out that Christianity will always be a torn in the side of Islam. I think of when Muslims tell me that Allah IS THE BEST OF PLANNERS, I think how is it possible they believe that? If Allah didn't make it appear that Jesus died on the cross, Christianity would NOT be an issue for Muslims today. How is that the best of plans? Since Islam rejects the reason the Bible gives for Jesus' virgin birth, it has then imperfectly borrowed the virgin birth story of Jesus from the NT Bible; therefore, I would have to say that the answer to the title of this thread The Holy Bible VS the Quran, the Bible wins hands down.
Peace
<br><br>If the concept was already there then prove it , where does it say . If the concept was there then AT LEAST there would have been a slight mention about it in the FIRST TWO CENTURIES!!!!<br><br><br><br>LOL thats why it is the fastest declining religion. <br><br>Throughout your stay here you have not been able to prove anything. You have admitted surprisingly to things like you do not know things in the bible, the gospels has varriations , the Old testament has typos!!!!<br><br>QuoteOriginally Posted by ;Burninglight
<br><br>nope christianity had a 600 year advantage but Islam is still the fastest growing religion and christianity is insicure about it!!!<br><br>QuoteOriginally Posted by ;Burninglight
<br><br>Better than the prophet deceiving image presented in the bible. plus I already explained this which you could not answer !!!!<br><br>QuoteOriginally Posted by ;Burninglight
<br><br>LOL this comes from a lack of understanding of the Quran which is not surprising coming from you<br><br>God deceived the Jews who attempted to kill Jesus peace be upon him , they plotted and God responded by plotting against them . However the true followers of Jesus such as Peter and Mary Jesus's mother knew the truth.<br><br>QuoteOriginally Posted by ;Burninglight
<br><br>LOL pathetic attempt , although it seems that you are trying to convinve your self and dellude the reader. <br>An answer like this reflects ignorance and no understanding of the word corruption. corruption means altered not replacing the whole gospel therefore the concept of the virgin birth since in the Quran then it must be in the original gospel<br><br>The title of this thread should show : the crushing defeat of the bible in the face of the Holy Quran <br><br>peace <br>QuoteOriginally Posted by ;Burninglight
<br>
There is no point proving it to you, because you will try to get out of it saying the Bible is corrupted like a broken record, so I will not waste my time on this with you. Besides, I have already shown you proof. If you don't believe what I say, you wouldn't believe if one came back from the dead to tell you!
* LOL, nor you!
Wow, so it took Allah that long (600 years) to realize people were believing by the Billions that Jesus died and rose for our sin, and that the torah was corrupted and needed His word guarded, and as a result Christianity still out weighs Islam in number and millions of Muslims covert to Christianity every day as well. What you share is far fetched friend. LOL, Christianity was made to appear as declining to you like Allah made it appear that Jesus died on the cross. His best of plans was deceptive in my mind's eye. He admits in the Quran; he does best what the unbelievers were doing. What were they doing? Were they plotting, scheming, deceiving and planning? Yes, that is it in a nutshell.
I don't need to convince myself of your delusions you do just fine convincing me. There is no misunderstanding on my part. As for Peter being a true follower, I agree, that is why Peter said: Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, 5 who by God's power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. 6 In this you rejoice, though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been grieved by various trials, 7 so that the tested genuineness of your faith—more precious than gold that perishes though it is tested by fire—may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ. 1Peter 1: 3-7
Of course, you will try to say this is a corruption, but that cannot be found anywhere in the Quran about the NT Bible or the gospel; so you are stuck with a discrepancy again
There is no ignorance on my part. The Quran borrowed the story from the gospel (a gospel that was never given to Jesus as the Quran states) and I proved that already, but it rejects the reason the gospel gives for His virgin birth to make up a corruption you now follow; therefore, the crushing defeat is the other way around friend!!!
Peace
Meaning you have no proof that trinity was mentioned in the FIRST CENTURY of christianity !!! LOL I asked bring me any mention of trinity in the FIRST CENTURY , I did not say in the bible because it does not exist there
I know I did prove but here you are confessing AGAIN that you didn'tQuoteOriginally Posted by Burninglight
Thank you for the confession
LOL you need to read what you say before you post it
LOL your perverse understanding of other's statement shows how weak and ignorant you are (as usual)QuoteOriginally Posted by Burninglight
You obviously were embarraced by the fact that your religion is rapidly declining due to a religion which came 600 years later
By the Burningignorant I already explained that the true followers of Jesus knew that he did not die because he told them but obviously you would not know
Actually Burningignorant I already proved that the Quran mentioned the corruption of the gospels Also from the hadeeth but as the coward you are you still avoided the answer rather gave me a vague obscure answer in another thread. This is your style , you run away and avoid answering by going to such pathetic tacticsQuoteOriginally Posted by Burninglight
BTW the first epistle of Peter is a pseudonymous text meaning the author attributed it to Peter while he was not actually Peter. It was as biblical new testament scholar say was written in 81 AD.
Also the Quran said the injil was corrupted . Again because of your poor understanding skills I have to repeat this , injil in Arabic= Gospel .
QuoteOriginally Posted by Burninglight
LOL you give no answer to my response . This is a smokescreen to cover your loses
you proved nothing!!!! Or else bring me your proof
LOL it seems that you are just posting to keep people and persuade them from seeing yours and your bible's crushing and humiliating defeat
BTW if you really think you proved it answer this question :
What is the definition of the word scripture corruption
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks