The Quran & The Bible in the light of Science and History

آخـــر الـــمـــشـــاركــــات


مـواقـع شـقــيـقـة
شبكة الفرقان الإسلامية شبكة سبيل الإسلام شبكة كلمة سواء الدعوية منتديات حراس العقيدة
البشارة الإسلامية منتديات طريق الإيمان منتدى التوحيد مكتبة المهتدون
موقع الشيخ احمد ديدات تليفزيون الحقيقة شبكة برسوميات شبكة المسيح كلمة الله
غرفة الحوار الإسلامي المسيحي مكافح الشبهات شبكة الحقيقة الإسلامية موقع بشارة المسيح
شبكة البهائية فى الميزان شبكة الأحمدية فى الميزان مركز براهين شبكة ضد الإلحاد

يرجى عدم تناول موضوعات سياسية حتى لا تتعرض العضوية للحظر

 

       

         

 

    

 

 

    

 

The Quran & The Bible in the light of Science and History

Results 1 to 10 of 64

Thread: The Quran & The Bible in the light of Science and History

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,275
    Religion
    الإسلام
    Last Activity
    04-12-2012
    At
    11:58 PM

    Default

    Part 3


    Qur’an & the Bible in the light of history and science

    Section II

    The Holy Book in the light of Qur’an and Hadith

    Chapter One

    What Qur’an says about the Holy Book

    A message I address to William Campbell and whoever follows his example:

    How to interpret God’s Book in a different way rather that given by the messenger PBUH and his companions whom Qur’an was revealed in their language? Who gave you the right to interpret the verses as you like?
    Do you accept if I follow your dirty method and interpret the Bible as I like without referring to the approved authentic interpreters from the church?
    Is this the honesty and objectivity which you called for as you wrote in the introduction of your book and the preamble part?
    It is not a shock for me to see you sailing ignorantly in Qur’an; however, you thought that you held the stars with your hands. Nevertheless, your ignorance has put in a dilemma because each step you have taken in the Qur’an condemns you and your belief.
    Logic says: any liar is to be objected to his fallacy by valid evidence which becomes a proof against him and not in his favour.
    If you use Qur’an as a proof for the validity of your so called the Holy book , then you have made of the Qur’an evidence against you and not for you.
    Before I start to answer the words of William Campbell and the verses which I cite in order to prove that his so called book and his Christian religion are right through the Qur’an, I must first explain certain important points that would facilitate for the reader and the seeker for truth to know what are the rules that William Campbell must rely on in order to place Qur’an in the scales through which he attained the right to cite verses from it.
    What is the concept of revelation in Christianity and Islam?
    • Revelation in Islam is the Holy Spirit of our master Gebril Peace Be upon Him. The great Qur’an came to confirm that Qur’an was revealed to the heart of the final messenger through the revelation angel whom Almighty God allocated within his tasks to reveal messages.

    (( وَإِنَّهُ لَتَنزِيلُ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ {192} نَزَلَ بِهِ الرُّوحُ الْأَمِينُ {193} عَلَى قَلْبِكَ لِتَكُونَ مِنَ الْمُنذِرِينَ {194} بِلِسَانٍ عَرَبِيٍّ مُّبِينٍ {195})) الشعراء 193: 195
    [And Truly, this (the Qur’an) is a revelation from the Lord of all creation (Alamin (mankind, jinn and all that exists] (Al-Shoraa- 192)

    [Which the trustworthy Ruh (Jebril) (Gabriel) has brought down.] (193) [Upon your heart (O Muhammed PBUH) that you may be one of the warners,] (194) [in the plain Arabic language] (195) (Al-Shoraa 192-195)
    3399
    God supported our master Moses, Jesus, all prophets and messengers Peace Be upon them and our prophet by the Holy Spirit who is our master Gebriel Peace Be Upon Him.

    • The revelation in Christianity as it came in the website of the Anglican church at Qasr Al-Dobara (kdec) in the explanation of the Holy Qur’an revelation is as follows:
    The revelation or inspiration is the work of God’s spirit in human mind as guidance for the prophets and messengers and scribers of the Holy Books to show the divine truth, infallible. All written by scribers was to guide mankind was God’s words by truth and constitution bestowed to us from God for belief and work. The original copies which were produced by them were flawless as well. They have a divine master as well as each scribed or printed copy if it conformed to the original would have the same impact. The revelation was described as perfect i.e. sufficient to achieve its target. Revelation written books even if they were written by mankind through their minds and spiritual powers are God’s words and it is true to say that revelation is the father of words and ideas. … ended
    We must take into account that this concept would put in front of us a million question marks, because if we look at our master Dawood Peace Be Upon Him as they described in the Bible (no power or might except by God) we find that the revelation comes to Dawood to reeval to him at daytime, then the revelation comes to commit adultery at night as he did with Urea’s woman, then the revelation comes to him in order to kill his mistress’s husband? Can revelation and the devil be united at the same time while the Bible said that God’s spirit was embodied in Dawood till the end of his life?
    Samuel I Book 13 :16
    سفر صموئيل الأول 16:13
    فحلَ روحُ الرّبِّ على داوُدَ مِنْ ذلِكَ اليومِ فصاعِدًا
    Samuel I - 13 :16
    [ The soul of the Lord prevailed on David from that day on]

    After what we explained by the concept of revelation in Islam and Christianity, we come to another point which is : Christianity… did the Qur’an refer to a religion calling it Christianity?

    The Qur’anic websites are within your reach and you can apply the property of search and you will find that the Qur’an did not mention at all a religion called Christianity. Rather, it was stated in Qur’an that all religions sent by God to whom all might and glory belong ia Islam.
    قال تعالى :
    قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ
    [البقرة136]
    God to whom all might belongs said:

    [Say (O Muslims), “ We believe in Allah and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibrahim (Abraham), Ismail (Ishmael), Ishaq (Isaac), Ya’qub (Jacob), and to Al-Asbat [the offspring of the twelve sons of Ya’qub (Jacob). And that which has been given to Musa (Moses) and Isa (Jesus) and that which has been given to the prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam).]
    (Surat Al-Baqra- Verse No. 136)

    Islam means in general submission, obedience and conformity.
    However, Bani Israel chose for themselves Judaism and the followers of the Christ Isa (Jesus) son of Merriam chose for them Christianity.
    قال تعالى :
    وَقَالَتِ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَى نَحْنُ أَبْنَاء اللّهِ وَأَحِبَّاؤُهُ قُلْ فَلِمَ يُعَذِّبُكُم بِذُنُوبِكُم
    [المائدة18]
    God to whom all might belongs said:

    [And (both) the Jews and the Christians say: we are the children of Allah and His loved ones. “Say: “Why then does He punish you for your sins?”]
    (Surat Al-Maeda- Verse No. 18)

    However, all churches announce that Christianization is a Christian heresy as it used to believe in one God who does not belong to the Trinity conviction at all and is similar to Nastor نسطور.
    This is the Copts website testifying in this respect:





    • This is a translation of what was stated in the webpage:
    The website is an article on the Christian Ebionites and their relation tp Mohammed holder of Islamic Shari’a.

    • The name Christians were only named Ebionites. These Christians (Ebionites) had a way of thinking far away from Christian faith as it is a heresy separated from Christianity. Among them was the priest Warqa Bin Nofal.

    • On the other hand, when the Christian tries to confute, argue or fraud what was stated in Qur’an, we find him talking as if he were نصرانى Christianized; however, when you ask him : are you Christianized? You find that he denies at once his being Christianized. Rather, he confirms that he is Christian as a follower of Bolus not a disciple of the Christ… in addition, when you ask him: was the Christ the one who gave you the name of Christianity? We find the answer at once in negation because the Christ knew nothing about Christianity otherwise he would have talked about it.
    After we discussed Christianity and Christianization, we turn now to a new point : أهل الكتاب Ahl El-Ketab ( People of the Book)
    Is the Christian considered among أهل الكتاب Ahl El-Ketab ( People of the Book)
    When we asked people of the cross, descendents of the Jews this question, the reply came in negation. However, due to the strength and emphasis of the Muslim evidence against the Christian, we find him (the Christian) disguise or hide behind his views in order to attack the Muslim in his Isalm and belief.
    • Here is a Christian theologian spreading his conviction which declare that they are not أهل الكتاب Ahl El-Ketab ( People of the Book)





    • We are not Christianized as this was a sect that lived in ancient times in Arabia which has nothing at all in common concerning its conviction with the Christianity of Egypt’s Copts and we are not أهل الكتاب Ahl El-Ketab ( People of the Book)
    • Therefore, we find the Christian applying all methods of lying, forging and fraud as an attempt to Christianize Muslims. When he throws his dirty traps on the Muslim, he starts to disclose his true face while explaining new concepts which the victim, who fell in his traps, knew nothing about.
    Then we turn to another question: was the Christ Jesus son of Mariam or Jushua?
    The Christian does not believe that the Christ is Jesus son of Mariam, the priest Morkos Aziz said in the Al-Fagr Newspaper- volume No. 44 dated 3/4/2006 at page No. 27 : “We in Christianity know nothing about our master Jesus, but we know the Lord of glory, Jashua the Christ…” All churches have repeatedly announced that and their so-called book Holy did not announce the names of EISA or Yehia at all. The mistry that may puzzle some is: why the so called Holy Book did declare the names of some prophets who were stated in Qur’an specifically literally while it contradicted it with Eisa and Yehia?
    Some said that the reason may be due to the translation; however, I did not find that this was the reason or else the names of Moses, James, Eshaq, Lout, Joseph, Noah, Adam, Mariam, Zechariah, Pharaoh would be affected.
    Rather, the hidden point is forgery and alteration of the miracles bestowed by God to Eisa and the forgers attributed to John Al-Maamdan such speaking when he was still a baby in the cradle.

    On one hnad, they have indicated in Luke book that John spoke when he was in the cradle while it was Eisa “Jesus” who spoke in the cradle.

    لوقا 1: 64
    و في الحال انفتح فمه و لسانه و تكلم و بارك الله

    Luke 1:64

    [And at once his mouth was opened and his tongue loosed, and he began to speak in praise of God.]

    On the other hand, they mentioned the familial relationship between Jesus and Yehia. If the name Yehia was written, they have to mention the name of Jesus, and if the name of Jesus was written, they must mention the name of Yehia. Hence, they found that the best way is to distort names in order to escape such dilemma.

    After that we turn to the most important of all point which is: what is the difference between Moses’ Taurat as stated in Qur’an and as it was stated in the five legislative books attributed to Moses among the components of The Old Testament?

    What is the difference between the Bible of the Christ and the four bibles among the components of the New Testament?
    قال تعالى :
    وَقَفَّيْنَا عَلَى آثَارِهِم بِعَيسَى ابْنِ مَرْيَمَ مُصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَآتَيْنَاهُ الإِنجِيلَ
    [الماءئدة46]
    {And in their footsteps, we sent Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) confirming the Taurat (Torah) that had come before him, and we gave him the Injeel (Gospel)}
    (Al-Maaeda surat- Verse No. 46)

    قال تعالى :
    Last edited by نسيبة بنت كعب; 18-02-2008 at 06:03 PM.
    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي

The Quran & The Bible in the light of Science and History

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bible vs. Quran (Cosmology, Geocentrism Beliefs, etc)
    By فداء الرسول in forum English Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 29-06-2013, 08:16 PM
  2. La Bible le Coran et la science
    By لطفي مهدي in forum Forum Français
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21-07-2008, 01:47 AM
  3. Bible Compared to Quran
    By nohataha in forum English Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-01-2008, 10:17 PM
  4. BIBLE...................COMPARED TO......................QURAN
    By Drsalah_hanie in forum English Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-06-2007, 04:14 AM
  5. Qur'an And Bible In The Light Of Science .. Dr Zakir Naik vs. Dr William Campbell
    By الفقير الى الله in forum English Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18-01-2007, 07:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

The Quran & The Bible in the light of Science and History

The Quran & The Bible in the light of Science and History