سلسلة اقتباسات كاتب انجيل متى الخاطئة من العهد القديم

[محمد سني 1989]

الجزء السابع : حقل الفخاري

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

نقرا من انجيل متى 27:
5 فَطَرَحَ الْفِضَّةَ فِي الْهَيْكَلِ وَانْصَرَفَ، ثُمَّ مَضَى وَخَنَقَ نَفْسَهُ. 6 فَأَخَذَ رُؤَسَاءُ الْكَهَنَةِ الْفِضَّةَ وَقَالُوا: «لاَ يَحِلُّ أَنْ نُلْقِيَهَا فِي الْخِزَانَةِ لأَنَّهَا ثَمَنُ دَمٍ».
7 فَتَشَاوَرُوا وَاشْتَرَوْا بِهَا حَقْلَ الْفَخَّارِيِّ مَقْبَرَةً لِلْغُرَبَاءِ.
8 لِهذَا سُمِّيَ ذلِكَ الْحَقْلُ «حَقْلَ الدَّمِ» إِلَى هذَا الْيَوْمِ.
9 حِينَئِذٍ تَمَّ مَا قِيلَ بِإِرْمِيَا النَّبِيِّ الْقَائِلِ: «وَأَخَذُوا الثَّلاَثِينَ مِنَ الْفِضَّةِ، ثَمَنَ الْمُثَمَّنِ الَّذِي ثَمَّنُوهُ مِنْ بَني إِسْرَائِيلَ،
10 وَأَعْطَوْهَا عَنْ حَقْلِ الْفَخَّارِيِّ، كَمَا أَمَرَنِي الرَّبُّ».

خطا كبير في الاحالة من طرف كاتب انجيل متى لان الاقتباس ليس من سفر ارميا و لكن من سفر زكريا

نقرا في زكريا 11:
12 فَقُلْتُ لَهُمْ: «إِنْ حَسُنَ فِي أَعْيُنِكُمْ فَأَعْطُونِي أُجْرَتِي وَإِلاَّ فَامْتَنِعُوا». فَوَزَنُوا أُجْرَتِي ثَلاَثِينَ مِنَ الْفِضَّةِ.
13 فَقَالَ لِي الرَّبُّ: «أَلْقِهَا إِلَى الْفَخَّارِيِّ، الثَّمَنَ الْكَرِيمَ الَّذِي ثَمَّنُونِي بِهِ». فَأَخَذْتُ الثَّلاَثِينَ مِنَ الْفِضَّةِ وَأَلْقَيْتُهَا إِلَى الْفَخَّارِيِّ فِي بَيْتِ الرَّبِّ.
14 ثُمَّ قَصَفْتُ عَصَايَ الأُخْرَى «حِبَالاً» لأَنْقُضَ الإِخَاءَ بَيْنَ يَهُوذَا وَإِسْرَائِيلَ.



و حاول بعض شراح الكتاب المقدس التبرير لهذا بان ارمياء هو اول سفر من اسفار الانبياء ال12 في العهد القديم و لذلك فان الاحالة اليه كالاحالة الى احد تلك الاسفار فلا ضير

و هذا مردود للاسباب التالية:

اولا : ان اباء الكنيسة لم يذكروا هذا التبرير بل انهم في تبريرهم سلكوا عدة اقوال حاصلها :

1. ان النص تم خذفه من سفر ارمياء

2. ان النص موجود في سفر ابوكريفي لارمياء

3. انه خطا من الناسخ في العهد القديم


ننقل اقوال اباء الكنيسة :

القديس جيروم يذكر ان النص موجود في سفر ابوكريفي لارمياء
يقول ادم كلارك في تفسيره :
Jeremy the prophet - The words quoted here are not found in the Prophet Jeremiah, but in Zac 11:13. But St. Jerome says that a Hebrew of the sect of the Nazarenes showed him this prophecy in a Hebrew apocryphal copy of Jeremiah; but probably they were inserted there only to countenance the quotation here.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/clarke/mat027.htm

القديس يوسابيوس يصرح ان النص انه قد تكون النبوءة حذفت من ارمياء عمدا او انه خطا كتابي من مؤلف انجيل متى
نقرا من Demonstratio Evangelica Book X chapter 4
But as this passage is not found in the prophecy of Jeremiah, you must consider whether it is to be supposed that they have been removed through any evil intention, or whether there has been an error in copying, through the |209 mistake of some careless transcriber of the Holy Gospels, who wrote Jeremiah instead of Zechariah, where he ought to have copied, "Then was fulfilled that which was written by Zechariah the prophet," and instead of, "And they cast them into the house of the Lord, into the furnace," wrote in error, "And they bought with them the field of the potter.
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eu..._12_book10.htm

اما اريجن فانه يصرح ان النص موجود في كتاب ابوكريفي لارمياء
نقرا من The Old and New Testament StudentVol. 13, No. 6 (Dec., 1891), pp. 370

ملف مرفق 17287



https://www.jstor.org/stable/3157964...o_tab_contents


ثانيا : اعترف بعض شراح الكتاب المقدس بالخطا :

نقرا من Geneva Study Bible
Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by {e} Jeremy the prophet, saying, {f} And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;
(e) As this prophecy is found in Zec 11:12 it cannot be denied that Jeremy's name slipped into the text either through the fault of the Scribe, or by someone else's ignorance: it may also be that it came out of the margin by means of the abbreviation on one of the letters, the one being yod and the other being zayin, which are very similar: But in the Syrian text the Prophet's name is not written down at all.
(f) The evangelist does not follow the prophet's words, but instead he follows the prophet's meaning, which he shows to have been fulfilled
https://biblehub.com/commentaries/matthew/27-9.htm


نقرا من Wesley's Explanatory Notes
Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;
Then was fulfilled — What was figuratively represented of old, was now really accomplished.
What was spoken by the prophet — The word Jeremy, which was added to the text in latter copies, and thence received into many translations, is evidently a mistake: for he who spoke what St. Matthew here cites (or rather paraphrases) was not Jeremy, but Zechariah. Zechariah 11:12.
https://www.studylight.org/commentary/matthew/27-9.html

و نقرا من Abbott's Illustrated New Testament
Jeremy. The only passage now extant in the the prophetical writings of the Old Testament, to which this allusion can refer, is found, not in Jeremiah, but in Zechariah. (Zechariah 11:12,13.) Many ingenious explanations of this difficulty have been offered by the learned, but they are merely conjectural.
https://www.studylight.org/commentary/matthew/27-9.html


الخلاصة :

فنحن اذا امام خيارين لا ثالث لهما :

1. اما ان الكتاب المقدس تم تحريفه سواء بالخطا او بحذف النبوءة من العهد القديم عمدا او بالنقص بعدم ادخال سفر اخر خاص بارمياء ضمن الاسفار القانونية للعهد القديم

2. او ان مؤلف انجيل متى اخطا في الاحالة .

هذا وصلى الله على سيدنا محمد و على اله وصحبه وسلم