السلام عليكم

[محمود بسام]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
عندما قمت برفع فيديو على حسابي في احد المواقع على العجاز العلمي في القرءان الكريم باللغه الانجليزيه قام احد الملحدين من بريطانيا بالتعليق عليها ولكن لم افهم شئ وبالتالي لا اعرف ان ارد عليه والفيديو الاول هو
[web] [/web]
وكان تعليقه
Thomas Middleton: okay now that i've got some time free i will get stuck into these videos..

okay this is probably an obvious one but why is it that these amazing passages are only found after the discoveries have been made by science, for evidence that is, and to use Zakir Naik's own words " in a nutshell", they are remarkably ambiguous towards the subject...

oh and also the "big bang" is still only a theory, it is only used as it is the "best fit" with the currant conditions, but it has not been proven, there are actually hundreds of theories that have been made about the creation of the universe including the "balloon theory" and "multiple dimensions" to name a few...

oh and to the point about the "smoke" idea, remember that the entire passage hinges on the use of the word "smoke", otherwise it would not work, the rest of the passage is nothing more than the same ambiguous rubbish about the creation, using the use of a single word to prove an entire passage true is a logical fallacy

and the final point is simply astounding in it's own foolhardiness, the Quran said the universe expanded, now it was hardly going to contract was it?, when something has to appears it has to expand thats common sense that i'm pretty sure was never really in contention in the scientific community..

although the video was right about it not being a coincidence, it is todays religions stretching scientific theories around religious text, much like fitting a tyre round a metal wheel..