Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts

john Chapter 5 verse 4

For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.

the fourth century codex vaticanus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1246989047

Where is the text in this manuscript???


Existing texts are from the end of John chrapter 5 verse 3

In these lay a great multitude of impotent folk, of blind, halt, withered, waiting for the moving of the water.

Then John chapter 5 verse 5

And a certain man was there, which had an infirmity thirty and eight years


Codex Sinaiticus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1246989047


we ask the same question

Where did the text in the manuscript

Texts in the manuscript from end of John 5-3
To the beginning of John 5-5

Where is John disappeared 4-5

the poor father Matthew answer to the question and says


http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1246989053

traslation to english
Yellow text

(5:4)
(For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.)

This verse is not found in the manuscript, but it is important in some of them have been mentioned by some parents, including a golden mouth, saying that ((((the pond and water are already filming the Mamoip to give a picture of the image of Jews prior to the baptism in Christ will come and move the water by the owners is to pave the descriptive Siemlp for the Holy Spirit Lord of the angels)))

He explained the golden mouth, here follows the line to some extent, from which John is follow

The Book of Romans Chapter 11 verse 6

And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.


Codex Sinaiticus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247228760


Text in the manuscript is as follows:
ει δε χαριτι ουκετι εξ εργων επει η χαρις ουκετι γινεται χαρις

And the word end χαρις
its mean grace


According to the text quoted from the Arabic translation of Smith Vayeq, it is clear to us that the District is :

The acts was not yet a blessing. And only after the acts is not in accordance with

Is non-existent in this manuscript

We hope that any guest of a Christian that shows us where they come from the text and put it in English??


Christians are not still insist on their Scripture manuscripts attest to the Bible

Matthew Chapter 18 verse 11

For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost


Codex Sinaiticus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247310534


According to what is found in the manuscript, the text ends with matthew 18:12

And after that we find 18/12

How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray?


where matthew 18:12

Why Christians put it in the Arabic translation?

Codex Vaticanus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247310534

also the same in this manuscript

where matthew 18:12


Do Christians honestly convinced of the Bible after that

Matthew Chapter 27 verse 35

And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.


Codex Vaticanus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247395270

The color red in the test is not in Codex Vaticanus



Codex Sinaiticus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247395270


The same red color test is not in the manuscript as well as Codex Sinaiticus



codex Alexandrip

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247395270

the red color test is not in the manuscript



Thus, they distort the text to falsify the truth and falsely claim that the Old Testament had texts about the crucifixion of Jesus

Thus, it is clear that the Christian faith is judged on how their Scripture texts must be and can not take their faith from their Scripture

And we are still waiting to tell us honestly, and that the secretariat of the manuscripts to prove the validity of the holy
book of Christian

s

mark Chapter 11 verse 26

But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses

Codex Sinaiticus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247481696

The existing text in the manuscript is

mark 11:25

And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses.

And then

And they come again to Jerusalem: and as he was walking in the temple, there come to him the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders,


where mark 11:26
it Does not exist


Codex Vaticanus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247481696

also mark 11:26 is not exist


codex Alexandrip

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247481696
also mark chapter 11 verse 26 is not exist


It is what the Christian faith in the fact that there was no basis in the manuscripts
And the existence of the text in Arabic translations, but this does not mean that the distortion was deliberate with the premeditated

Is it not the fault of the manuscripts tell us that the health of their Scripture are holy

Ephesians
Chapter 3 verse 9

And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

Codex Sinaiticus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247581806

jesus christ Words Non-existent in Manuscript

codex Alexandrip

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247581806

also the same words (jesus christ) not fond

Codex Vaticanus

http://ebnmaryam.com/vb/attachment.p...1&d=1247581806

also the words jesus crist not fond

can we say after that manuscripts attest to the Bible
can we say that it Impossible to distort the Bible