Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts

آخـــر الـــمـــشـــاركــــات


مـواقـع شـقــيـقـة
شبكة الفرقان الإسلامية شبكة سبيل الإسلام شبكة كلمة سواء الدعوية منتديات حراس العقيدة
البشارة الإسلامية منتديات طريق الإيمان منتدى التوحيد مكتبة المهتدون
موقع الشيخ احمد ديدات تليفزيون الحقيقة شبكة برسوميات المرصد الإسلامي لمقاومة التنصير
غرفة الحوار الإسلامي المسيحي مكافح الشبهات شبكة الحقيقة الإسلامية موقع الدعوة الإسلامية
شبكة البهائية فى الميزان شبكة الأحمدية فى الميزان مركز براهين شبكة ضد الإلحاد

يرجى عدم تناول موضوعات سياسية حتى لا تتعرض العضوية للحظر

 

       

         

 

    

 

 

    

 

Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    352
    Last Activity
    15-10-2010
    At
    09:27 PM

    Default Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts


    john Chapter 5 verse 4

    For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.


    the fourth century codex vaticanus



    Where is the text in this manuscript???


    Existing texts are from the end of John chrapter 5 verse 3

    In these lay a great multitude of impotent folk, of blind, halt, withered, waiting for the moving of the water.

    Then John chapter 5 verse 5

    And a certain man was there, which had an infirmity thirty and eight years


    Codex Sinaiticus




    we ask the same question

    Where did the text in the manuscript

    Texts in the manuscript from end of John 5-3
    To the beginning of John 5-5

    Where is John disappeared 4-5

    the poor father Matthew answer to the question and says




    traslation to english
    Yellow text

    (5:4)
    (For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.)


    This verse is not found in the manuscript, but it is important in some of them have been mentioned by some parents, including a golden mouth, saying that ((((the pond and water are already filming the Mamoip to give a picture of the image of Jews prior to the baptism in Christ will come and move the water by the owners is to pave the descriptive Siemlp for the Holy Spirit Lord of the angels)))

    He explained the golden mouth, here follows the line to some extent, from which John is follow
    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي
    وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُوداً أَوْ نَصَارَى تَهْتَدُواْ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفاً وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (135) قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ (136)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    352
    Last Activity
    15-10-2010
    At
    09:27 PM

    Default


    The Book of Romans Chapter 11 verse 6

    And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work
    .


    Codex Sinaiticus




    Text in the manuscript is as follows:
    ει δε χαριτι ουκετι εξ εργων επει η χαρις ουκετι γινεται χαρις

    And the word end χαρις
    its mean grace


    According to the text quoted from the Arabic translation of Smith Vayeq, it is clear to us that the District is :

    The acts was not yet a blessing. And only after the acts is not in accordance with

    Is non-existent in this manuscript

    We hope that any guest of a Christian that shows us where they come from the text and put it in English??


    Christians are not still insist on their Scripture manuscripts attest to the Bible
    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي
    وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُوداً أَوْ نَصَارَى تَهْتَدُواْ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفاً وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (135) قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ (136)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    352
    Last Activity
    15-10-2010
    At
    09:27 PM

    Default


    Matthew Chapter 18 verse 11

    For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost


    Codex Sinaiticus




    According to what is found in the manuscript, the text ends with matthew 18:12

    And after that we find 18/12

    How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray?


    where matthew 18:12

    Why Christians put it in the Arabic translation?

    Codex Vaticanus



    also the same in this manuscript

    where matthew 18:12


    Do Christians honestly convinced of the Bible after that
    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي
    وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُوداً أَوْ نَصَارَى تَهْتَدُواْ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفاً وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (135) قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ (136)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    352
    Last Activity
    15-10-2010
    At
    09:27 PM

    Default

    Matthew Chapter 27 verse 35

    And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.



    Codex Vaticanus



    The color red in the test is not in Codex Vaticanus



    Codex Sinaiticus




    The same red color test is not in the manuscript as well as Codex Sinaiticus



    codex Alexandrip



    the red color test is not in the manuscript



    Thus, they distort the text to falsify the truth and falsely claim that the Old Testament had texts about the crucifixion of Jesus

    Thus, it is clear that the Christian faith is judged on how their Scripture texts must be and can not take their faith from their Scripture

    And we are still waiting to tell us honestly, and that the secretariat of the manuscripts to prove the validity of the holy
    book of Christian
    s
    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي
    وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُوداً أَوْ نَصَارَى تَهْتَدُواْ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفاً وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (135) قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ (136)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    352
    Last Activity
    15-10-2010
    At
    09:27 PM

    Default


    mark Chapter 11 verse 26

    But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses

    Codex Sinaiticus



    The existing text in the manuscript is

    mark 11:25

    And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have ought against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses.


    And then

    And they come again to Jerusalem: and as he was walking in the temple, there come to him the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders,


    where mark 11:26
    it Does not exist


    Codex Vaticanus



    also mark 11:26 is not exist


    codex Alexandrip


    also mark chapter 11 verse 26 is not exist


    It is what the Christian faith in the fact that there was no basis in the manuscripts
    And the existence of the text in Arabic translations, but this does not mean that the distortion was deliberate with the premeditated

    Is it not the fault of the manuscripts tell us that the health of their Scripture are holy

    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي
    وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُوداً أَوْ نَصَارَى تَهْتَدُواْ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفاً وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (135) قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ (136)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    352
    Last Activity
    15-10-2010
    At
    09:27 PM

    Default


    Ephesians
    Chapter 3 verse 9

    And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things
    by Jesus Christ:

    Codex Sinaiticus



    jesus christ Words Non-existent in Manuscript

    codex Alexandrip



    also the same words (jesus christ) not fond

    Codex Vaticanus



    also the words jesus crist not fond

    can we say after that manuscripts attest to the Bible
    can we say that it Impossible to distort the Bible

    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي
    وَقَالُواْ كُونُواْ هُوداً أَوْ نَصَارَى تَهْتَدُواْ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفاً وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ (135) قُولُواْ آمَنَّا بِاللّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لاَ نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ (136)

Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bible Expert Left ChristianiDr Bart Ehrman lecturing about the history of Bible part1
    By nohataha in forum منتدى قصص المسلمين الجدد
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-04-2010, 02:22 PM
  2. Bible Inconsistencies: Bible Contradictions
    By فداء الرسول in forum English Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-12-2009, 10:40 PM
  3. The distortion of the Holy Book
    By فريد عبد العليم in forum المنتدى الإسلامي العام
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-11-2009, 02:00 AM
  4. Jesus Seminar on the distortion of the Bible
    By شبكة بن مريم الإسلامية in forum English Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-10-2009, 11:54 AM
  5. What the Qur'an says about the Bible?
    By Alexi_Tarek in forum English Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2005, 11:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts

Distortion of the Bible from within the manuscripts