I need an answer abut this Suspicion

آخـــر الـــمـــشـــاركــــات


مـواقـع شـقــيـقـة
شبكة الفرقان الإسلامية شبكة سبيل الإسلام شبكة كلمة سواء الدعوية منتديات حراس العقيدة
البشارة الإسلامية منتديات طريق الإيمان منتدى التوحيد مكتبة المهتدون
موقع الشيخ احمد ديدات تليفزيون الحقيقة شبكة برسوميات شبكة المسيح كلمة الله
غرفة الحوار الإسلامي المسيحي مكافح الشبهات شبكة الحقيقة الإسلامية موقع بشارة المسيح
شبكة البهائية فى الميزان شبكة الأحمدية فى الميزان مركز براهين شبكة ضد الإلحاد

يرجى عدم تناول موضوعات سياسية حتى لا تتعرض العضوية للحظر

 

       

         

 

    

 

 

    

 

I need an answer abut this Suspicion

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: I need an answer abut this Suspicion

  1. #1
    أم تسنيم's Avatar
    أم تسنيم is offline عضوة مميزة
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    250
    Last Activity
    29-11-2011
    At
    11:27 PM

    Default I need an answer abut this Suspicion

    Assalamu alaikum



    Offensive Jihad

    1. Introduction
    2. Offensive Jihad in the Qur’an
    3. Offensive Jihad in strong Ahadith
    4. Offensive Jihad in Islamic lawschools (Fiqh)
    5. Offensive Jihad interpreted by acknowledged Islamic authorities

    1.Introduction
    Offensive jihad is one of Islams core doctrines, and is connected to ‘’itman al-hujjah’’, ‘’completiton of proof’, that indicates that religious truth has been explained by the messenger of Allah, that has made it accessible for the people. The people has therefore no excuse to deny the truth. If they do, they can be punished by Allah or by the people. The latter alternative is valid if the messenger has consolidated his power and has enough of companions to carry through his will. The purpose is to eradicate all resitstance against the messengers message. The prototype is of course Muhammad and his late campaigns against the remaining disbelievers in Arabia.

    2.Offensive Jihad in the Quran
    Offensive jihad is decreed in several verses in the Quran. The maybe most central is the following vers in the 9th Suran, that also contain the famous ‘’the verse of the sword’’ (9:5), that urge to war against disbelievers and according to the doctrine about nashk (abrogation) revoke all earlier made treaties with the disbelievers.
    Quote:
    9:29 Fight against such of those who have been given the ******ure as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.


    Ibn Kathir (1301-1373 AD) comments this verse in his classical tafsir, that still is counted as one of the most popular tafsir-collections.

    Quote:
    This honorable Ayah [Koranvers] was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah's religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims' control. Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the ******ures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. […] Muslims are not allowed to honor the people of Dhimmah or elevate them above Muslims, for they are miserable, disgraced and humiliated.

    3.Offensive Jihad in strong ahadith
    The same message is given i the two most honourable ahadith-collections, hadith Sahih Bukhari and hadith Sahih Muslim. These collections constitute one of Islams foundations, together with the Quran and Sira (biography of Muhammad). They are most highly respected ahadith-collections, and is looked upon as sahih, credible, which means that ahadith in them are historically correct and reliable by the majority of all Muslims. It shall be noted that the highest grade of sahih are the ahadith with similar ******* that can be found in both Bukhari and Muslim. Ahadith like those that will now follow, that deals with the three alternative the disbelievers shall be put before, are therefore as strong and highly respected as ahadith ever can be.

    Hadith Sahih Bukhari (Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24)
    Quote:
    Allah's Apostle said: ”I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives an property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”


    Hadith Sahih Muslim (Book 19, Number 4294)
    Quote:
    [Muhammed] would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. […] If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them.


    Several other verses in the Quran command armed offensive struggle, for example 9:123, here presented with excerpt from Maariful Tafsir and Ibn Kathir.

    Quote:
    O ye who believe! Fight the disbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you: and know that God is with those who fear Him. (9:123)

    5.4 MAARIFUL TAFSIR ON 9:123 Page 503

    Previous verses carried inducement to Jihad. The first verse from the present ones (123) which opens with the words:
    (O those who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you) gives details, for disbelievers are spread out all over the world and any confrontation with them has to have some sort of functional sequence. The verse says that Jihad should first be waged against those of the disbelievers who were near. "Being near" could be taken in terms of the place, that is, the disbelievers who live closer to home base should be fought against first. And it could also be understood in terms of relationship, that is, those who are near in kinship, parentage and other social bonds should be given precedence. This is because Islamic Jihad is essentially carried out in their interest and for their well being, therefore, when it comes to care and concern, kinsfolk have precedence - similar to the command given to the Holy Prophet (And warn your near relatives against the punishment of Allah - 26:214). He carried out the command by assembling people from his family and conveyed to them the Word of Allah as revealed to him. The circle then became larger.

    Keeping the same principle of near and far, confronted first, as compared to other, were disbelievers who lived in the vicinity of Madinah, such as
    Banu Qurayzah, Banu Nadir, and the people of Khaibar. After that came the fight against the rest within the Arabian Peninsula. And after things were settled there came the last command to fight the disbelievers of Byzantium that resulted in the expedition of Tabuk.

    5.5 IBN KATHIR ON 9:123
    The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas

    Allah commands the believers to fight the disbelievers, the closest in area to the Islamic state, then the farthest. This is why the Messenger of Allah
    started fighting the idolators in the Arabian Peninsula. When he finished with them and Allah gave him control over Makkah, Al-Madinah, At-Ta'if, Yemen, Yamamah, Hajr, Khaybar, Hadramawt and other Arab provinces, and the various Arab tribes entered Islam in large crowds, he then started fighting the People of the ******ures.

    He began preparations to fight the Romans who were the closest in area to the Arabian Peninsula, and as such, had the most right to be called to Islam, especially since they were from the People of the ******ures. The Prophet marched until he reached Tabuk and went back because of the extreme hardship, little rain and little supplies. This battle occurred on the ninth year after his Hijrah. In the tenth year, the Messenger of Allah was busy with the Farewell Hajj. The Messenger died eighty-one days after he returned from that Hajj, Allah chose him for what He had prepared for him [in Paradise].

    After his death, his executor, friend, and Khalifah, Abu Bakr As-Siddiq, may Allah be pleased with him, became the leader. At that time, the religion came under attack and would have been defeated, if it had not been for the fact that Allah gave the religion firmness through Abu Bakr, who established its basis and made its foundations firm. He brought those who strayed from the religion back to it, and made those who reverted from Islam return. He took the Zakah from the evil people who did not want to pay it, and explained the truth to those who were unaware of it. On behalf of the Prophet , Abu Bakr delivered what he was entrusted with. Then, he started preparing the Islamic armies to fight the Roman cross worshippers, and the Persian fire worshippers. By the blessing of his mission, Allah opened the lands for him and brought down Caesar and Kisra and those who obeyed them among the servants.

    Abu Bakr spent their treasures in the cause of Allah, just as the Messenger of Allah had foretold would happen. This mission continued after Abu Bakr at the hands of he whom Abu Bakr chose to be his successor, Al-Faruq, the Martyr of the Mihrab, Abu Hafs, `Umar bin Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him. With `Umar, Allah humiliated the disbelievers, suppressed the tyrants and hypocrites, and opened the eastern and western parts of the world. The treasures of various countries were brought to `Umar from near and far provinces, and he divided them according to the legitimate and accepted method. `Umar then died as a martyr after he lived a praise worthy life. Then, the Companions among the Muhajirin and Ansar agreed to chose after `Umar, `Uthman bin `Affan, Leader of the faithful and Martyr of the House, may Allah be pleased with him. During `Uthman's reign, Islam wore its widest garment and Allah's unequivocal proof was established in various parts of the world over the necks of the servants. Islam appeared in the eastern and western parts of the world and Allah's Word was elevated and His religion apparent. The pure religion reached its deepest aims against Allah's enemies, and whenever Muslims overcame an Ummah, they moved to the next one, and then the next one, crushing the tyrannical evil doers. They did this in reverence to Allah's statement,

    (O you who believe! (O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you,)


    4.Offensive Jihad in the Islamic schools of Fiqh

    All of the four schools of law undersign these three alternatives. The ****s that is quoted here are from influnencial ****s from different representatives for the different schools.


    Maliki:
    Quote:
    ”Jihad is a precept of Divine institution. Its performance by certain individuals may dispense others from it. We Malikis maintain that it is preferable not to begin hostilities with the enemy before having invited the latter to embrace the religion of Allah except where the enemy attacks first. They have the alternative of either converting to Islam or paying the poll tax (jizya), short of which war will be declared against them.”

    -Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (922-996 AD), La risala, p. 65, quoted in The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam (Cranston, NJ, 1996, p. 295).

    Shafi’i:
    Quote:
    "The mushrikun [infidels] of Dar al-Harb (the arena of battle) are of two types: First, those whom the call of Islam has reached, but they have refused it and have taken up arms. The amir of the army has the option of fighting them […] in accordance with what he judges to be in the best interest of the Muslims and most harmful to the mushrikun […] Second, those whom the invitation to Islam has not reached, although such persons are few nowadays since Allah has made manifest the call of his Messenger […] it is forbidden to […] begin an attack before explaining the invitation to Islam to them, informing them of the miracles of the Prophet and making plain the proofs so as to encourage acceptance on their part; if they still refuse to accept after this, war is waged against them and they are treated as those whom the call has reached"

    -Abu’l Hasan Al-Mawardi (972-1058 AD) The Laws of Islamic Governance [al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah], (London, 1996, p. 60)

    Hanbali:
    Quote:
    "Since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God's entirely and God's word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought. As for those who cannot offer resistance or cannot fight, such as women, children, monks, old people, the blind, handicapped and their likes, they shall not be killed unless they actually fight with words (e.g. by propaganda) and acts (e.g. by spying or otherwise assisting in the warfare)."

    -Ibn Taymiya (1263-1328 AD), quoted in Rudolph Peters, Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam (Princeton, NJ., 1996, p. 49)

    Hanafi:
    Quote:
    "It is not lawful to make war upon any people who have never before been called to the faith, without previously requiring them to embrace it, because the Prophet so instructed his commanders, directing them to call the infidels to the faith, and also because the people will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and not for the sake of taking their property, or making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save themselves from the troubles of war […] If the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them, because God is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do."

    -Shaikh Burhanuddin Ali av Marghinan (1135-1196 AD), Hiddayah vol. 2, p. 140, quoted in A Dictionary of Islam, p. 243-248
    5.Offensive Jihad interpreted by acknowledged Islamic authorities
    Offensive jihad is legitimized by known authors like Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406 AD) by many seen as the most respected historians among the historians:


    Quote:
    "In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force […] The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense […] Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.”


    This is a result of the same intolerance against dissidents that is given in the following diatrib against Christians:

    Quote:
    ”We do not think that we should blacken the pages of this book with discussion of their dogmas of unbelief. In general, they are well known. All of them are unbelief. This is clearly stated in the noble Koran. To discuss or argue those things with them is not up to us. It is for them to choose between conversion to Islam, payment of the poll tax, or death."

    -Ibn Khaldun, The Muqudimmah. An Introduction to History, translated by Franz Rosenthal (New York, N.Y., 1958, vol. 1, p. 473; reference to page is missing in the second quote)
    An other famous historian that thinks more or less alike is Ibn Rushd, more known as Averroes (1126-1198 AD) who writes:


    Quote:
    "According to all scholars the prerequisite for warfare is that the enemy must have heard the summons to to islam. This implies that it is not allowed to attack them before the summons have reached them. All moslems are agreed about this because of (Koran 17:15) ’We have not been accustomed to punish until we have sent a messenger’.”

    -Averroës, Bidayat al-mudjtahid, translated by Peters (Leiden, 1977, p. 9-25)
    The authors that has been quoted so far lived during the Middle Ages, but their ****s has in no way been made theological invalibe, instead these sources are still being read and is still being seen as normative. Offensive jihad is still today seen as legitimate. Abdullah Yusuf Azzam did impose in his fatwah Defense of the Muslim Lands; the First Obligation after Faith (1979) after the invasion of the Sovjetunion on Afghanistan. The fatwah was supported by the mufti of Saudi Arabia, Abd al-Aziz bin Bazz. Azzam legitimize both defensive and offensive jihad.

    Quote:
    ”Jihad Against the Kuffar is of two Types: Offensive Jihad (where the enemy is attacked in his own territory) ... [and] Defensive Jihad. […] Where the Kuffar [infidels] are not gathering to fight the Muslims, the fighting becomes Fard Kifaya [religious obligation on Muslim society] with the minimum requirement of appointing believers to guard borders, and the sending of an army at least once a year to terrorise the enemies of Allah. It is a duty of the Imam to assemble and send out an army unit into the land of war once or twice every year. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the Muslim population to assist him, and if he does not send an army he is in sin. - And the Ulama have mentioned that this type of jihad is for maintaining the payment of Jizya. The scholars of the principles of religion have also said: ’Jihad is Daw’ah with a force, and is obligatory to perform with all available capabilities, until there remains only Muslims or people who submit to Islam.”

    http://www.religioscope.com/info/doc ... _chap1.htm

    One can state on very influencial Islamic lawbook beloning to school of Shafi’i that was approved by University of Al-Azhar in Cairo in 1991, Sunni Islams highest authority, who wrote it was in accordance with ”the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community.” The Manual, ‘Umdat al-Salik (translated into English as Reliance of the Traveller), define ’’the great jihad’’ as ’’spiritual war against the lower self’’ and then devote eleven pages to ‘’the smaller jihad’’ as ‘’war against non Muslims’’. The word is said to derive from mujahada, which is explained as ‘’war that establishes the religion’’. How this was is to be done is clarified in the following: ”the caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians […] until they become Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax.” The manual add an comment from a Jordanian lawyer who do sign to Muhammads decree to invite the disbelievers to Islam before war is started: the caliph only goes to war ”provided that he has first invited [Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians] to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya) […] while remaining in their ancestral religions.” Finally it should be noted that Muslims still have to fight jihad, even if there is no caliph.

    The Muslim Brotherhoods creator, Hasan al-Banna, writes in his **** ‘Jihad’ that offensive jihad was decreed by Muhammad, and that these decrees are still legitimized.

    Quote :
    The verses of the Qur'an and the Sunnah […] summon people in general […] to jihad, to warfare, to the armed forces, and all means of land and sea fighting.

    All Muslims Must Make Jihad
    Jihad is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded. Allah has ascribed great importance to jihad and has made the reward of the martyrs and the fighters in His way a splendid one. Only those who have acted similarly and who have modeled themselves upon the martyrs in their performance of jihad can join them in this reward. Furthermore, Allah has specifically honoured the Mujahideen {those who wage jihad} with certain exceptional qualities, both spiritual and practical, to benefit them in this world and the next. Their pure blood is a symbol of victory in this world and the mark of success and felicity in the world to come.

    Those who can only find excuses, however, have been warned of extremely dreadful punishments and Allah has described them with the most unfortunate of names. He has reprimanded them for their cowardice and lack of spirit, and castigated them for their weakness and truancy. In this world, they will be surrounded by dishonour and in the next they will be surrounded by the fire from which they shall not escape though they may possess much wealth. The weaknesses of abstention and evasion of jihad are regarded by Allah as one of the major sins, and one of the seven sins that guarantee failure.

    Islam is concerned with the question of jihad and the drafting and the mobilisation of the entire Umma {the global Muslim community} into one body to defend the right cause with all its strength than any other ancient or modern system of living, whether religious or civil. The verses of the Qur'an and the Sunnah of Muhammad (PBUH) are overflowing with all these noble ideals and they summon people in general (with the most eloquent expression and the clearest exposition) to jihad, to warfare, to the armed forces, and all means of land and sea fighting.
    […]

    The Scholars on Jihad
    I have just presented to you some verses from the Qur'an and the Noble Ahadith concerning the importance of jihad. Now I would like to present to you some of the opinions from jurisprudence of the Islamic Schools of Thought including some latter day authorities regarding the rules of jihad and the necessity for preparedness. From this we will come to realise how far the ummah has deviated in its practice of Islam as can be seen from the consensus of its scholars on the question of jihad.
    The author of the 'Majma' al-Anhar fi Sharh Multaqal-Abhar', in describing the rules of jihad according to the Hanafi School, said: 'Jihad linguistically means to exert one's utmost effort in word and action; in the Sharee'ah {Sharia -- Islamic law} it is the fighting of the unbelievers, and involves all possible efforts that are necessary to dismantle the power of the enemies of Islam including beating them, plundering their wealth, destroying their places of worship and smashing their idols. This means that jihad is to strive to the utmost to ensure the strength of Islam by such means as fighting those who fight you and the dhimmies {non-Muslims living under Islamic rule} (if they violate any of the terms of the treaty) and the apostates (who are the worst of unbelievers, for they disbelieved after they have affirmed their belief).

    It is fard (obligatory) on us to fight with the enemies. The Imam must send a military expedition to the Dar-al-Harb {House of War -- the non-Muslim world} every year at least once or twice, and the people must support him in this. If some of the people fulfill the obligation, the remainder are released from the obligation. If this fard kifayah (communal obligation) cannot be fulfilled by that group, then the responsibility lies with the closest adjacent group, and then the closest after that etc., and if the fard kifayah cannot be fulfilled except by all the people, it then becomes a fard 'ayn (individual obligation), like prayer on everyone of the people.
    […]
    The scholarly people are of one opinion on this matter as should be evident and this is irrespective of whether these scholars were Mujtahideen or Muqalideen and it is irrespective of whether these scholars were salaf (early) or khalaf (late). They all agreed unanimously that jihad is a fard kifayah imposed upon the Islamic ummah in order to spread the Da'wah of Islam, and that jihad is a fard 'ayn if an enemy attacks Muslim lands. Today, my brother, the Muslims as you know are forced to be subservient before others and are ruled by disbelievers. Our lands have been besieged, and our hurruma'at (personal possessions, respect, honour, dignity and privacy) violated. Our enemies are overlooking our affairs, and the rites of our din are under their jurisdiction. Yet still the Muslims fail to fulfill the responsibility of Da'wah that is on their shoulders. Hence in this situation it becomes the duty of each and every Muslim to make jihad. He should prepare himself mentally and physically such that when comes the decision of Allah, he will be ready.

    I should not finish this discussion without mentioning to you that the Muslims, throughout every period of their history (before the present period of oppression in which their dignity has been lost) have never abandoned jihad nor did they ever become negligent in its performance, not even their religious authorities, mystics, craftsmen, etc. They were all always ready and prepared. For example, Abdullah ibn al Mubarak, a very learned and pious man, was a volunteer in jihad for most of his life, and 'Abdulwahid bin Zayd, a sufi and a devout man, was the same. And in his time, Shaqiq al Balkhi, the shaykh of the sufis encouraged his pupils towards jihad. …

    Associated Matters Concerning Jihad
    Many Muslims today mistakenly believe that fighting the enemy is jihad asghar (a lesser jihad) and that fighting one's ego is jihad akbar (a greater jihad). The following narration [athar] is quoted as proof: "We have returned from the lesser jihad to embark on the greater jihad." They said: "What is the greater jihad?" He said: "The jihad of the heart, or the jihad against one's ego."
    This narration is used by some to lessen the importance of fighting, to discourage any preparation for combat, and to deter any offering of jihad in Allah's way. This narration is not a saheeh (sound) tradition: The prominent muhaddith Al Hafiz ibn Hajar al-Asqalani said in the Tasdid al-Qaws:
    'It is well known and often repeated, and was a saying of Ibrahim ibn 'Abla.'
    Al Hafiz Al Iraqi said in the Takhrij Ahadith al-Ahya':
    ’Al Bayhaqi transmitted it with a weak chain of narrators on the authority of Jabir, and Al Khatib transmitted it in his history on the authority of Jabir.'
    Nevertheless, even if it were a sound tradition, it would never warrant abandoning jihad or preparing for it in order to rescue the territories of the Muslims and repel the attacks of the disbelievers. Let it be known that this narration simply emphasises the importance of struggling against one's ego so that Allah will be the sole purpose of everyone of our actions.
    Other associated matters concerning jihad include commanding the good and forbidding the evil. It is said in the Hadeeth: "One of the greatest forms of jihad is to utter a word of truth in the presence of a tyrannical ruler." But nothing compares to the honour of shahadah kubra (the supreme martyrdom) or the reward that is waiting for the Mujahideen.

    Epilogue
    My brothers! The ummah that knows how to die a noble and honourable death is granted an exalted life in this world and eternal felicity in the next. Degradation and dishonour are the results of the love of this world and the fear of death. Therefore prepare for jihad and be the lovers of death. Life itself shall come searching after you.
    My brothers, you should know that one day you will face death and this ominous event can only occur once. If you suffer on this occasion in the way of Allah, it will be to your benefit in this world and your reward in the next. And remember brother that nothing can happen without the Will of Allah: ponder well what Allah, the Blessed, the Almighty, has said:
    'Then after the distress, He sent down security for you. Slumber overtook a party of you, while another party was thinking about themselves (as to how to save themselves, ignoring the others and the Prophet) and thought wrongly of Allah - the thought of ignorance. They said, "Have we any part in the affair?" Say you (O Muhammad): "Indeed the affair belongs wholly to Allah." They hide within themselves what they dare not reveal to you, saying: "If we had anything to do with the affair, none of us would have been killed here." Say: "Even if you had remained in your homes, those for whom death was decreed would certainly have gone forth to the place of their death: but that Allah might test what is in your hearts; and to purify that which was in your hearts (sins), and Allah is All-Knower of what is in (your) hearts."' {Sura 3:154}


    Muhammad Taqi Partovi Samzevari summarizes in Future of the Islamic Movement (1986) the Islamic view of war.
    Quote:
    Our own Prophet […] was a general, a statesman, an administrator, an economist, a jurist and a first-class manager all in one. […] In the Qur’an’s historic vision Allah’s support and the revolutionary struggle of the people must come together, so that Satanic rulers are brought down and put to death. A people that is not prepared to kill and to die in order to create a just society cannot expect any support from Allah. The Almighty has promised us that the day will come when the whole of mankind will live united under the banner of Islam, when the sign of the Crescent, the symbol of Muhammad, will be supreme everywhere. […] But that day must be hastened through our Jihad, through our readiness to offer our lives and to shed the unclean blood of those who do not see the light brought from the Heavens by Muhammad in his mi’raj {“nocturnal voyages to the ‘court’ of Allah”}. […] It is Allah who puts the gun in our hand. But we cannot expect Him to pull the trigger as well simply because we are faint-hearted.


    That offensive jihad still is taught within Islam can be read on following pages.

    http://www.islam-qa.com/index.php?re ... amp;ln=eng

    Quote:
    Fourthly:
    Physical jihad against the kaafirs becomes obligatory in four cases, which are:
    1 – When the Muslim is present in a jihad situation.
    2 – When the enemy has come and attacked a Muslim land
    3 – When the ruler mobilizes the people, they must respond.
    4 – When a person is needed and no one else can do the task except him.


    http://www.islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=12128
    Quote:
    You should understand that we as Muslims firmly believe that the person who doesn't believe in Allah as he is required to, is a disbeliever who would be doomed to Hell eternally. Thus one of the primary responsibilities of the Muslim ruler is to spread Islam throughout the world, thus saving people from eternal damnation.

    Thus what is meant by the passage in Tafsir Uthmani, is that if a country doesn't allow the propagation of Islam to its inhabitants in a suitable manner or creates hindrances to this, then the Muslim ruler would be justifying in waging Jihad against this country, so that the message of Islam can reach its inhabitants, thus saving them from the Fire of Jahannum. If the Kuffaar allow us to spread Islam peacefully, then we would not wage Jihad against them.

    and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best

    Mufti Ebrahim Desai


    Islam Question and Answer - www.islam-qa.com, Question No 26125
    Quote:
    The difference between jihad and qitaal, and the types of jihad for the sake of Allaah
    Quote:
    Question:
    What is the difference between "Jihad" and "Qitaal" ?.

    Quote:
    Answer:
    Praise be to Allaah.

    The word jihad is more general than the word qitaal (fighting). Jihaad may be with the tongue (by speaking out), or with weapons (which is qitaal or fighting) or with money. Each of these categories includes numerous subcategories.

    Jihad with the tongue includes jihad against the kaafirs, as well as jihad against the hypocrites, jihad against the people of bid’ah (innovation), and jihad against the people of misguidance and whims and desires.

    Qitaal may only be done with weapons; it includes fighting the kaafirs, fighting the wrongdoers and fighting the Khawaarij.
    The greatest kind of fighting is fighting those who disbelieve, for Allaah has commanded us to fight them. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

    Quote:
    “Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allaah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allaah and His Messenger (Muhammad), (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the ******ure (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” [al-Tawbah 9:29]

    Quote:
    “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you”
    [al-Tawbah 9:123]

    Quote:
    Jihaad against the kuffaar with weapons is of two types: jihad talab (offensive jihad) and jihad daf’ (defensive jihad).

    Jihad talab means attacking the kuffaar in their own lands until they become Muslim or pay the jizyah with willing submission and feel themselves subdued. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I have been commanded to fight the people until they bear witness that there is no god but Allaah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah, and establish regular prayer, and pay zakaah. If they do that, then they have protected their blood and their wealth from me, except in cases decreed by Islamic law, and their reckoning with be with Allaah.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 25; Muslim, 20.

    The purpose of this kind of jihad is not to fight the kuffaar and take their wealth, rather jihad is prescribed for a great purpose which is discussed in question no. 34637.

    Quote:
    The second type is jihad al-daf’ (defensive jihad). If the enemy attacks a Muslim country or fights a Muslim country, then jihad is obligatory in that case. If the people of that country are able to undertake this obligation, then all well and good, and the others should support them, both financially and spiritually (by making du’aa’ for them). If the people in that country are not able to undertake this obligation by themselves, then those who are nearby must support them, each according to his ability, whether by giving money, speaking out, or going and fighting. And Allaah knows best.

    See also questions no. 20214 and 34830.

    Quote:
    The responses are handled by Sheikh Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid, using only authentic, scholarly sources based on the Quran and sunnah, and other reliable contemporary scholarly opinions. References are provided where appropriate in the responses. All requests are held with confidence, and replies are available personally and/or publicly (posted to this site)


    For more reading it is recommended to read Silas article on Answering Islam about the verse of the sword, 9:5.


    http://www.***************.de/Main/S ... dverse.htm

    Compiled by Reinhard

    Sources :

    Sources:
    The Quran, 9:29
    Hadith Sahih Bukhari (Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24)
    Hadith Sahih Muslim (Book 19, Number 4294)
    The Quran, 9:123
    -Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (922-996 e.Kr.), La risala, s. 65, citerad i The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam (Cranston, NJ, 1996, s. 295).
    -Abu’l Hasan Al-Mawardi (972-1058 e.Kr.) The Laws of Islamic Governance [al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah], (London, 1996, s. 60)
    -Ibn Taymiya (1263-1328 e.Kr.), citerad i Rudolph Peters, Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam (Princeton, NJ., 1996, s. 49)
    -Shaikh Burhanuddin Ali av Marghinan (1135-1196 e.Kr.), Hiddayah vol. 2, s. 140, citerad i A Dictionary of Islam, s. 243-248
    -Ibn Khaldun, The Muqudimmah. An Introduction to History, övers. Franz Rosenthal (New York, N.Y., 1958, vol. 1, s. 473; pagereference is missing to the second quote)
    -Averroës, Bidayat al-mudjtahid, övers. Peters (Leiden, 1977, s. 9-25)
    Muhammad Taqi Partovi Samzevari summarizes

    __________________
    Last edited by أم تسنيم; 16-06-2007 at 12:46 AM.

  2. #2
    السيف البتار's Avatar
    السيف البتار is offline مدير المنتدى
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,148
    Religion
    الإسلام
    Last Activity
    14-12-2017
    At
    11:22 PM

    Default

    إن كان سيدنا محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم ليس رسول الله لمدة 23 عاماً .. فلماذا لم يعاقبه معبود الكنيسة ؟
    .
    والنَّبيُّ (الكاذب) والكاهنُ وكُلُّ مَنْ يقولُ: هذا وَحيُ الرّبِّ، أُعاقِبُهُ هوَ وأهلُ بَيتِهِ *
    وأُلْحِقُ بِكُم عارًا أبديُا وخزْيًا دائِمًا لن يُنْسى
    (ارميا 23:-40-34)
    وأيُّ نبيٍّ تكلَّمَ باَسْمي كلامًا زائدًا لم آمُرْهُ بهِ، أو تكلَّمَ باَسْمِ آلهةٍ أُخرى، فجزاؤُهُ القَتْلُ(تث 18:20)
    .
    .
    الموسوعة المسيحية العربية *** من كتب هذه الأسفار *** موسوعة رد الشبهات ***

  3. #3
    السيف البتار's Avatar
    السيف البتار is offline مدير المنتدى
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,148
    Religion
    الإسلام
    Last Activity
    14-12-2017
    At
    11:22 PM

    Default

    Last edited by السيف البتار; 21-06-2007 at 01:30 AM.
    إن كان سيدنا محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم ليس رسول الله لمدة 23 عاماً .. فلماذا لم يعاقبه معبود الكنيسة ؟
    .
    والنَّبيُّ (الكاذب) والكاهنُ وكُلُّ مَنْ يقولُ: هذا وَحيُ الرّبِّ، أُعاقِبُهُ هوَ وأهلُ بَيتِهِ *
    وأُلْحِقُ بِكُم عارًا أبديُا وخزْيًا دائِمًا لن يُنْسى
    (ارميا 23:-40-34)
    وأيُّ نبيٍّ تكلَّمَ باَسْمي كلامًا زائدًا لم آمُرْهُ بهِ، أو تكلَّمَ باَسْمِ آلهةٍ أُخرى، فجزاؤُهُ القَتْلُ(تث 18:20)
    .
    .
    الموسوعة المسيحية العربية *** من كتب هذه الأسفار *** موسوعة رد الشبهات ***

  4. #4
    أسد الدين's Avatar
    أسد الدين is online now مدير المنتدى
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,800
    Religion
    Islam
    Gender
    Male
    Last Activity
    16-12-2017
    At
    03:02 PM

  5. #5
    أم تسنيم's Avatar
    أم تسنيم is offline عضوة مميزة
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    250
    Last Activity
    29-11-2011
    At
    11:27 PM

    Default

    الاخ السيف البتار

    موقع مسلم اورج قادياني


    هل قرأتم المقال اخوتي الافاضل؟ هناك بعض النقاظ التي لم يرد عليها في اللينكات.

  6. #6
    أسد الدين's Avatar
    أسد الدين is online now مدير المنتدى
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,800
    Religion
    Islam
    Gender
    Male
    Last Activity
    16-12-2017
    At
    03:02 PM

    Default

    اختي الفاضلة ام تنسيم
    هذا الموقع به من اللنكات ما هو كافي للرد على كل ما سبق ذكره

    http://www.answering-christianity.co..._terrorism.htm

    و سأحاول تفصيل ذلك ان شاء الله




    Quote
    1.Introduction
    ِالرد :
    http://www.answering-christianity.com/jihad.htm

    1- What is Jihad?

    Jihad means struggling in the name of Allah Almighty. Jihad doesn't always mean a war or battle. Any mean for spreading Islam and the Truth, or to fight for what is right and condemn what is wrong (such as fighting the bad and helping the oppressed even if they were not Muslims) are considered Jihad.

    I am doing Jihad right now by maintaining my web site, because it is a tool that can be used for spreading Islam and the Truth. And because it is also a Media tool, it could be used for fighting for what is right and condemning what is wrong.

    Islam is not a religion of arms and swords! When Allah Almighty revealed the Noble Quran to Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, and Muhammad became the Messenger of GOD Almighty, Muhammad had to spread Islam to 365 Pagan Arab Tribes. These tribes showed so much hostility toward the Muslims and Islam, and have imposed so many battles against the Muslims.

    Later, when Islam was the religion of what we call today Saudi Arabia, and the 365 Pagan Arab tribes mostly converted to Islam, the Muslims had to yet face another type of challenge.

    The Nuclear Soviet Union and the United States of America of our days were the Great Empires of the Christian Romans and the Pagan Persians. If you know geography and history well enough, then you would see that the Muslims were trapped between those two big Super Powers.

    Hostility and Battles from those two Empires were imposed upon the Muslims. For instance, when our Prophet peace be upon him sent his messenger to "Kisrah", the Emperor of Persia, introducing Islam to him, Kisrah ordered for the Muslims' Messenger to be executed!

    Back then, like today, this was considered a coward act. It was the Persians who showed the hostility toward the Muslims and declared the many battles against Islam.

    The Christian Romans weren't any better. For instance, in one of their many battles against the Muslims is when they saw the threat to their religion in the Middle East, the King "Herucl", sent out an army of 100,000 men and ordered them to go to "Madina" in what we call today Saudi Arabia to destroy Islam once and for all.

    The Muslims were not stable yet at that time, and they only sent out an army of 3,000 men at that time to drive the Christian Romans away from Madina. The battle was named "The battle of Mo'ta" and it took place in Mo'ta, Jordan today.

    The Muslims' plan was to meet the Christian Romans far away from Madina, and to have them stray away from Madina. The army of 3,000 men was successful enough to fight the Christian Romans for few days and then to pull away from the battle and headed South of Jordan. The Romans strayed away from Madina and the small army of the Muslims was able to run away through the mountains. More than half of the 3,000 Muslims however were killed in this operation.

    The point is that Islam didn't spread by sword with much choice. The wars were imposed upon the Muslims. The Muslims didn't ask for those wars.

    Islam is a Religion of Love and Peace and Forgiveness






    Quote
    2. Offensive Jihad in the Qur’an
    الرد :

    http://www.answering-christianity.com/jihad.htm

    The reason for "Jihad" Noble Verses:


    The so-called "Jihad" Noble Verses came for specific times and places. They don't apply for all times and everybody! I can't slay you, a non-Muslim, just because you're not a Muslim. The pagan Arabs were very hostile people and only knew the sword as an answer. Many wars were imposed upon the Muslims, and thus, it is only normal and natural to find Noble Verses that deal with these specific hostile situations. But the Message of the Noble Quran is PEACE, as clearly proven in Noble Verses 2:190, 8:61 and 5:28 above.



    The laws of war in Islam:

    Muslims are forbidden from attacking others who do not attack them:

    "Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors. (The Noble Quran, 2:190)"

    Fighting in the cause of GOD Almighty those who fight us is what "Jihad" is all about. I can't go and kill a non-Muslim just because he is a non-Muslim. That is absolutely forbidden in Islam:

    "On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land. (Noble Quran 5:32)"

    "Those who invoke not, with God, any other god, nor slay such life as God has made sacred except for just cause, nor commit fornication; - and any that does this (not only) meets punishment. (But) the Penalty on the Day Of Judgement will be doubled To him, and he will dwell Therein in ignominy. (The Noble Quran, 25:68-69)"

    Jihad can only be declared when the Muslims are attacked. Muslims are not allowed to attach those who do not attack them. And even when war breaks out, if the enemy offers an honest peace, then we should accept it and end the blood shed:

    "But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in God: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things). (The Noble Quran, 8:61)"

    And if a treaty of peace was made, then we must honor that treaty to the end:

    "Except those who join a group between whom and you there is a treaty (of peace), or those who approach you with hearts restraining them from fighting you as well as fighting their own people. If God had pleased, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you: Therefore if they withdraw from you but fight you not, and (instead) send you (Guarantees of) peace, then God Hath opened no way for you (to war against them). (The Noble Quran, 4:90)"

    "How can there be a league, before God and His Apostle, with the Pagans, except those with whom ye made a treaty near the sacred Mosque? As long as these stand true to you, stand ye true to them: for God doth love the righteous. (The Noble Quran, 9:7)"




    Quote
    3. Offensive Jihad in strong Ahadith
    الرد :

    http://www.answering-christianity.co...al_revenge.htm

    1- Muhammad never took revenge for his own sake, but for the sake of Allah Almighty and Islam:

    We must first of all know that when Islam came, it came among 365 Arab Pagan Tribes, and they were all idol worshipers, women abusers and enslavers. Islam came and fought idol worshiping, oppressing women and racism and slavery (which is by the way clearly promoted in the Bible's Old and New Testaments) in many bloody battles that were imposed upon the Muslims without any choice for the Muslims. So, if we hear about few pigs from the Pagans getting killed for the sake of Allah Almighty, it should not raise any red flags in our minds about the validity of Islam and it's tolerance to non-Muslims.

    Narrated 'Aisha: "Whenever Allah's Apostle was given the choice of one of two matters, he would choose the easier of the two, as long as it was not sinful to do so, but if it was sinful to do so, he would not approach it. Allah's Apostle never took revenge (over anybody) for his own sake but (he did) only when Allah's Legal Bindings were outraged in which case he would take revenge for Allah's Sake. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Virtues and Merits of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his Companions, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 760)"

    Narrated 'Aisha: "Whenever Allah's Apostle was given the choice of one of two matters he would choose the easier of the two as long as it was not sinful to do so, but if it was sinful, he would not approach it. Allah's Apostle never took revenge over anybody for his own sake but (he did) only when Allah's legal bindings were outraged, in which case he would take revenge for Allah's sake. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Good Manners and Form (Al-Adab), Volume 8, Book 73, Number 147)"

    Narrated Aisha: "Whenever the Prophet was given an option between two things, he used to select the easier of the tow as long as it was not sinful; but if it was sinful, he would remain far from it. By Allah, he never took revenge for himself concerning any matter that was presented to him, but when Allah's Limits were transgressed, he would take revenge for Allah's Sake. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Limits and Punishments set by Allah (Hudood), Volume 8, Book 81, Number 777)"

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: That he fought in a Ghazwa towards Najd along with Allah's Apostle and when Allah's Apostle returned, he too, returned along with him. The time of the afternoon nap overtook them when they were in a valley full of thorny trees. Allah's Apostle dismounted and the people dispersed amongst the thorny trees, seeking the shade of the trees. Allah's Apostle took ****ter under a Samura tree and hung his sword on it. We slept for a while when Allah's Apostle suddenly called us, and we went to him, to find a bedouin sitting with him. Allah's Apostle said, "This (bedouin) took my sword out of its sheath while I was asleep. When I woke up, the naked sword was in his hand and he said to me, 'Who can save you from me?, I replied, 'Allah.' Now here he is sitting." Allah's Apostle did not punish him (for that) .(Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Military Expeditions Led By The Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi), Volume 5, Book 59, Number 458)"

    Narrated Jafar bin 'Amr bin Umaiya: I went out with 'Ubaidullah bin 'Adi Al-Khaiyar. When we reached Hims (i.e. a town in Syria), 'Ubaidullah bin 'Adi said (to me), "Would you like to see Wahshi so that we may ask him about the killing of Hamza?" I replied, "Yes." Wahshi used to live in Hims. We enquired about him and somebody said to us, "He is that in the shade of his palace, as if he were a full water skin." So we went up to him, and when we were at a short distance from him, we greeted him and he greeted us in return. 'Ubaidullah was wearing his turban and Wahshi could not see except his eyes and feet. 'Ubaidullah said, "O Wahshi! Do you know me?" Wahshi looked at him and then said, "No, by Allah! But I know that 'Adi bin Al-Khiyar married a woman called Um Qital, the daughter of Abu Al-Is, and she delivered a boy for him at Mecca, and I looked for a wet nurse for that child. (Once) I carried that child along with his mother and then I handed him over to her, and your feet resemble that child's feet." Then 'Ubaidullah uncovered his face and said (to Wahshi), "Will you tell us (the story of) the killing of Hamza?" Wahshi replied "Yes, Hamza killed Tuaima bin 'Adi bin Al-Khaiyar at Badr (battle) so my master, Jubair bin Mut'im said to me, 'If you kill Hamza in revenge for my uncle, then you will be set free." When the people set out (for the battle of Uhud) in the year of 'Ainain ..'Ainain is a mountain near the mountain of Uhud, and between it and Uhud there is a valley.. I went out with the people for the battle. When the army aligned for the fight, Siba' came out and said, 'Is there any (Muslim) to accept my challenge to a duel?' Hamza bin 'Abdul Muttalib came out and said, 'O Siba'. O Ibn Um Anmar, the one who circumcises other ladies! Do you challenge Allah and His Apostle?' Then Hamza attacked and killed him, causing him to be non-extant like the bygone yesterday. I hid myself under a rock, and when he (i.e. Hamza) came near me, I threw my spear at him, driving it into his umbilicus so that it came out through his buttocks, causing him to die. When all the people returned to Mecca, I too returned with them. I stayed in (Mecca) till Islam spread in it (i.e. Mecca). Then I left for Taif, and when the people (of Taif) sent their messengers to Allah's Apostle, I was told that the Prophet did not harm the messengers; So I too went out with them till I reached Allah's Apostle. When he saw me, he said, 'Are you Wahshi?' I said, 'Yes.' He said, 'Was it you who killed Hamza?' I replied, 'What happened is what you have been told of.' He said, 'Can you hide your face from me?' So I went out when Allah's Apostle died, and Musailamah Al-Kadhdhab appeared (claiming to be a prophet). I said, 'I will go out to Musailamah so that I may kill him, and make amends for killing Hamza. So I went out with the people (to fight Musailamah and his followers) and then famous events took place concerning that battle. Suddenly I saw a man (i.e. Musailamah) standing near a gap in a wall. He looked like an ash-colored camel and his hair was dishevelled. So I threw my spear at him, driving it into his chest in between his breasts till it passed out through his shoulders, and then an Ansari man attacked him and struck him on the head with a sword. 'Abdullah bin 'Umar said, 'A slave girl on the roof of a house said: Alas! The chief of the believers (i.e. Musailamah) has been killed by a black slave."(Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Military Expeditions Led By The Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi), Volume 5, Book 59, Number 399)"

    Here we clearly see that the Prophet did not have Wahshi killed for killing the Prophets beloved uncle.

    Personal Revenge Helps the Devil:

    Narrated Sa'id ibn al-Musayyab: "While the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) was sitting with some of his companions, a man reviled AbuBakr and insulted him. But AbuBakr remained silent. He insulted him twice, but AbuBakr controlled himself. He insulted him thrice and AbuBakr took revenge on him. Then the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) got up when AbuBakr took revenge.

    AbuBakr said: Were you angry with me, Apostle of Allah?

    The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) replied: An angel came down from Heaven and he was rejecting what he had said to you. When you took revenge, a devil came down. I was not going to sit when the devil came down. (Translation of Sunan Abu-Dawud, General Behavior (Kitab Al-Adab), Book 41, Number 4878)"

    In the above narrations about our Prophet peace be upon him, we clearly without any doubt that he never seeked any personal revenge for his own sake. Prophet Muhammad was Allah Almighty's Messenger, and the leader of the Muslims. He never took things personal. He always seeked the higher level and bigger picture of things. If he executed some pigs, then it is crystal clear from the above narrations about him that he didn't do it for his own personal sake or revenge, but the sake of Allah Almighty, Islam and the Muslims.





    2- Allah Almighty revenged for our Prophet and Islam:

    In the following narration, we see a list of names of some Pagans whom the hypocrites of the Christian "Answering Islam" team seem to love and adore very much that they made such a big deal out of them, and decided to invent fabricated cheap lies against our beloved Prophet. In the following narration, we see how Allah Almighty revenged for our beloved Prophet and killed some of the pigs who caused a lot of sufferings for the Muslims 1400 years ago, whom the Christian "Answering Islam" hypocrites love and adore so much, that insha'Allah (may Allah Almighty Will it) will end up with them in Hell Fire!

    Narrated 'Amr bin Maimuin: "Abdullah bin Mas'ud said, "While Allah's Apostle was praying beside the Ka'ba, there were some Quraish people sitting in a gathering. One of them said, 'Don't you see this (who does deeds just to show off)? Who amongst you can go and bring the dung, blood and the abdominal *******s (intestines, etc). of the slaughtered camels of the family of so and so and then wait till he prostrates and put that in between his shoulders?' The most unfortunate amongst them ('Uqba bin Abi Mu'ait) went (and brought them) and when Allah's Apostle prostrated, he put them between his shoulders. The Prophet remained in prostration and they laughed so much so that they fell on each other. A passerby went to Fatima, who was a young girl in those days. She came running and the Prophet was still in prostration. She removed them and cursed upon the Quraish on their faces. When Allah's Apostle completed his prayer, he said, 'O Allah! Take revenge on Quraish.' He said so thrice and added, 'O Allah! take revenge on 'Amr bin Hisham, 'Utba bin Rabia, Shaiba bin Rabi'a, Al-Walid bin'Utba, Umaiya bin Khalaf, 'Uqba bin Abi Mu'ait and 'Umar a bin Al-Walid." Abdullah added, "By Allah! I saw all of them dead in the battle field on the day of Badr and they were dragged and thrown in the Qalib (a well) at Badr: Allah's Apostle then said, 'Allah's curse has descended upon the people of the Qalib (well). (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Virtues of the Prayer Hall (Sutra of the Musalla), Volume 1, Book 9, Number 499)"

    This narration doesn't in anyway prove the false lies that our Prophet is full of hatred that he wished the death and torture of non-Muslims. This lie's statement is too general and too vast. It's easy for some hater of Islam to say such a statement. But as we've seen in the above narrations, our beloved Prophet peace be upon him is full of forgiveness and love toward others.





    3- Repelling evil with good in Islam:

    Allah Almighty in the Noble Quran commands us to return the evil that is done to us by others to not only with good, but with best!.

    Let us look at Noble Verse 13:22 "Those who patiently persevere, seeking the countenance of their Lord; establish regular prayers; spend out of (the gifts) We have bestowed for their sustenance, secretly and openly; and turn off evil with good: for such there is the final attainment of the (Eternal) Home."

    Let us look at Noble Verse 23:96 "Repel evil with that which is best: We are Well-acquainted with the things they say."

    Let us look at Noble Verse 41:34 "Nor can goodness and evil be equal. Repel (evil) with that is better: Then will he between whom and thee was hatred become as it were thy friend and intimate!."

    Let us look at Noble Verse 28:54 "Twice will they be given their reward, for that they have persevered, that they avert evil with good, and that they spend (in charity) out of what We have given them."

    Let us look at Noble Verse 42:40 "The recompense for an injury is an injury equal thereto (in degree): but if a person forgives and makes reconciliation, his reward is due from Allah: for (Allah) Loveth not those who do wrong."

    Allah Almighty loves those who restrain anger: "Those who spend (freely), whether in prosperity, or in adversity; who restrain anger, and pardon (all) men; for Allah loves those who do good. (The Noble Quran, 3:134)"

    Whether people speak evil of you, in your presence or behind your back, or they do evil to you in either of those ways, all is known to Allah Almighty. It is not for you to punish. Your best course is not to do evil in your turn, but to do what will best repel the evil. Two evils do not make a good.

    You do not return good for evil, for there is no equality or comparison between the two. You repel or destroy evil with something which is far better, just as an antidote is better than poison. You foil hatred with love. You repel ignorance with knowledge, folly and wickedness with the friendly message of Revelation. The man who was in bondage of sin, you not only liberate from sin, but make him your greatest friend and helper in the cause of Allah Almighty!. Such is the alchemy of the Word of Allah Almighty!. Your credit for returning evil with good and paying for charity is double. Also if you forgive and return the evil with good, then Allah Almighty will love you and reward you.





    4- No fighting is allowed in Mecca:

    Narrated Abu Huraira: "In the year of the Conquest of Mecca, the tribe of Khuza'a killed a man from the tribe of Bani Laith in revenge for a killed person, belonging to them. They informed the Prophet about it. So he rode his Rahila (she-camel for riding) and addressed the people saying, "Allah held back the killing from Mecca. (The sub-narrator is in doubt whether the Prophet said "elephant or killing," as the Arabic words standing for these words have great similarity in shape), but He (Allah) let His Apostle and the believers over power the infidels of Mecca. Beware! (Mecca is a sanctuary) Verily! Fighting in Mecca was not permitted for anyone before me nor will it be permitted for anyone after me. It (war) in it was made legal for me for few hours or so on that day. No doubt it is at this moment a sanctuary, it is not allowed to uproot its thorny shrubs or to uproot its trees or to pick up its Luqatt (fallen things) except by a person who will look for its owner (announce it publicly). And if somebody is killed, then his closest relative has the right to choose one of the two-- the blood money (Diyya) or retaliation having the killer killed. In the meantime a man from Yemen came and said, "O Allah's Apostle! Get that written for me." The Prophet ordered his companions to write that for him. Then a man from Quraish said, "Except Al-Iqhkhir (a type of grass that has good smell) O Allah's Apostle, as we use it in our houses and graves." The Prophet said, "Except Al-Idhkhiri.e. Al-Idhkhir is allowed to be plucked." (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Knowledge, Volume 1, Book 3, Number 112)"

    Some of the infidels that were killed whom the Christian "Answering Islam" team made a great deal out of were killed during the few hours that fighting was permitted in Mecca. When Muslims conquered Mecca, Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him ordered them to enter the city with their swords covered in their cases. Some of the infidels resisted the Muslims for few hours and this is where some blood shed took place.

    The story of the 10,000 Muslim believers conquering Mecca was foretold in the Bible.

    The point, however, is that Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him didn't seek personal revenges against people, and certainly he was not a murderer. He was Allah Almighty's Messenger who Spread Islam to Mankind by peace, except when wars were imposed upon him and his followers.


    What does the Qu'ran say about violence?

    The word Islam, which means "surrender (to GOD)," is related to the Arabic salam, “peace.” When the Prophet Muhammad brought the revealed ******ure called the Qu'ran (“recitation”) to the Arabs in the early 7th century C.E., one of his main purposes was precisely to stop the kind of indiscriminate killing we saw on September 11th.

    At the time the Arabian Peninsula was in crisis. The tribal system was breaking down, and the various tribes were locked into a murderous cycle of vendetta and counter vendetta. For a weak tribe, or a man who lacked powerful protection, survival was nearly impossible. The Prophet himself suffered several assassination attempts, and when his religious and social message ran him afoul of the establishment of Mecca, the small Muslim community was persecuted. Things got so bad that the Muslims had to migrate to Medina, some 250 miles to the north, and there they were subject to attack by the Meccan army, the greatest power in Arabia.

    For about five years, there was war and the Muslims narrowly escaped extermination. Terrible things were done on both sides. But when Muhammad sensed that the tide had just begun turn in his favor, he completely changed tack. He concentrated on building a peaceful coalition of tribes, and initiated an inspired, brave and ingenious policy of non-violence. This proved so successful that eventually Mecca opened its gates to the Muslims voluntarily, without a single drop of blood being shed.

    Because the Qu'ran was revealed in the con**** of an all-out war, several passages deal with the conduct of armed conflict. Warfare was a desperate business in Arabia. An Arab chieftain was not expected to take prisoners; it was a given that he would simply kill everybody he could get his hands on. Muhammad knew that if the Muslims were defeated they would all be slaughtered to the last man or woman.

    Sometimes the Qu'ran seems to have imbibed this spirit. Muslims are ordered by God to “slay [the enemy] wherever you find them. (4:89). Muslim extremists like Bin Laden like to quote these verses, but they do so selectively, never quoting the exhortations to peace and forbearance that in almost every case mitigate these ferocious injunctions in the verses immediately following. Thus “If they leave you alone and offer to make peace with you, God does not allow you to harm them.” (4:90)

    Therefore the only war condoned by the Qu'ran is a war of self-defense. "Warfare is an awesome evil" (2:217), but sometimes it is necessary to fight in order to bring the kind of persecution suffered by the Muslims to an end [2:217] or to preserve decent values [22:40]. But Muslims may never initiate hostilities, and aggression is forbidden by God [2:190] While the fighting continues, Muslims must dedicate themselves wholly to the war in order to bring things back to normal as quickly as possible, but the second the enemy sues for peace, hostilities must cease. [2:192]




    5- What about the Bible's cruelty?

    Introduction: We must first of all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and unreliable and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption! "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

    The Revised Standard Version makes it even clearer: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

    In either translation, we clearly see that the Jews had so much corrupted the Bible with their man-made cultural laws, that they had turned the Bible into a lie!

    See Also Deuteronomy 31:25-29 where Moses peace be upon him predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death.

    The Book of Moses predicted that the Law (Bible) will get corrupted. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed confirm this corruption.



    There are several Verses in the Bible that seem to be very cruel. Let us look at few of them:

    Let us look at Numbers 31:17 "Now kill all the boys [innocent kids]. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."

    Also, let us look at Numbers 31:35-40 "[From the captives of war] 32,000 women who had never slept with a man.......of which the tribute for the LORD was 32 [virgin women]."

    Why kill the innocent children? Why kill all of the non-virgin women? Back then, it was only men who fought men in wars. Women rarely fought in battle fields. So what crime did the innocent children and the non-virgin women do?

    This verse was sent to me by Yusif 65; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him: "But after they had moved it, the LORD's hand was against that city, throwing it into a great panic. He afflicted the people of the city, both young and old, with an outbreak of tumors. (From the NIV Bible, 1 Samuel 5:9)"

    "tumors" was defined as "with tumors in the groin." This is verified at this link.

    Why torture the enemies by destroying their groins?

    I wonder how the hypocrites of the Christian "Answering Islam" team would reply to these verses from their x-rated pornographic Bible.

    Did you also know that fathers are allowed to insert their fingers into their daughters' vaginas in the porn-full bible?

    My Question: My question to those hypocrites is, using your own standards, does this also make your porn-full bible an "invalid" book?



    Quote

    4. Offensive Jihad in Islamic lawschools (Fiqh)
    5. Offensive Jihad interpreted by acknowledged Islamic authorities

    الرد :

    أظن ان الرد على العنصرين لا يحتاج كثير كلام
    و هو ان ديننا قرآن و سنة و نحن نأخذ ديننا منهما و من فهم السلف الصالح لهما و ليس من اقوال المتطرفين ...
    فإن اتفق كلام المدارس مع ما فهمه السلف الصالح و هو ما اوردناه آنفا , فذاك و الا فكلامهم مردود ! لانه اجتهاد شخصي قد يصيب او يُخطئ !

    (اختي ام تنسيم , اظن انك تستطيعين ترجمة هذا الكلام)


    Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi Condemns Attacks Against Civilians: Forbidden in
    Islam




    DOHA, Qatar, Sept 13 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Renowned Muslim scholar
    Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi denounced the attacks against civilians in the U.S.
    Tuesday and encouraged Muslims to donate blood to the victims of the attack.

    In response to the bloody attack against civilians in the U.S., Sheikh Yusuf
    issued a statement Wednesday saying that:

    "Our hearts bleed for the attacks that has targeted the World Trade Center
    [WTC], as well as other institutions in the United States despite our strong
    oppositions to the American biased policy towards Israel on the military,
    political and economic fronts.

    "Islam, the religion of tolerance, holds the human soul in high esteem, and
    considers the attack against innocent human beings a grave sin, this is
    backed by the Qur'anic verse which reads:

    Who so ever kills a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in
    the earth, it shall be as if he has killed all mankind, and who so ever saves
    the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind,"
    (Al-Ma'dah:32).

    "The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, is reported to have said, 'A
    believer remains within the scope of his religion as long as he doesn't kill
    another person illegally'," the prominent scholar said.

    He added that haphazard killing where the rough is taken with the smooth and
    where innocents are killed along with wrongdoers is totally forbidden in
    Islam. No one, as far as Islam is concerned, is held responsible for
    another's actions. Upon seeing a woman killed in the battlefield, the
    Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, denied the act and said: "That
    woman shouldn't have been killed anyway!".

    Even in times of war, Muslims are not allowed to kill anybody save the one
    who is indulged in face-to-face confrontation with them. They are not allowed
    to kill women, old persons, children, or even a monk in his religious
    seclusion.

    Qaradawi then asserted that is why killing hundreds of helpless civilians who
    have nothing to do with the decision-making process and are striving hard to
    earn their daily bread, such as the victims of the latest explosions in
    America, is a heinous crime in Islam. The Prophet, peace and blessings be
    upon him, is reported to have stated that a woman was qualified to enter Hell
    because of the cat she locked up to death.

    "If such is the ruling applied in protecting animals, no doubt, aggression
    against human beings, a fortiori, deserves greater protection, for human
    beings are honored by Allah Almighty and are His vicegerents on earth," he
    added.

    Al Qaradawi said, "we Arab Muslims are the most affected by the grave
    consequences of hostile attack on man and life. We share the suffering
    experienced by innocent Palestinians at the hands of the tyrannical Jewish
    entity who raze the Palestinian homes to the ground, set fire to their tilth,
    kill them cold-bloodedly, and leave innocent orphans wailing behind.

    "With this in mind, the daily life in Palestine has become a permanent
    memorial gathering. When Palestinians face such unjust aggression, they tend
    to stem bloodletting and destruction and not to claim the lives of innocent
    civilians."

    "I categorically go against a committed Muslim's embarking on such attacks.
    Islam never allows a Muslim to kill the innocent and the helpless.

    "If such attacks were carried out by a Muslim - as some biased groups claim -
    then we, in the name of our religion, deny the act and incriminate the
    perpetrator. We do confirm that the aggressor deserves the deterrent
    punishment irrespective of his religion, race or gender," he added.

    "What we warn against, even if becomes a reality, is to hold a whole nation
    accountable for a crime carried out by a limited number of people or to
    characterize a certain religion as a faith giving support to violence and
    terrorism," Qaradawi said.

    Qaradawi clarified that when the well-known Oklahoma incident was carried out
    by a Christian American, who was driven by a personal interests,
    Christianity, America or even the Christian world, were not accused of the
    attack because a Christian masterminded it.

    "I have been asked several questions on TV programs and on public lectures
    about the martyr operations outside the Palestinian territories, and I always
    answer that I do agree with those who do not allow such martyr operations to
    be carried out outside the Palestinian territories.

    "Instead we should concentrate on facing the occupying enemy directly. It is
    not permissible, as far as Islam is concerned, to shift confrontation outside
    the Palestinian territories. This is backed by the Qur'anic verse that reads:
    "Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not
    hostilities. Lo! Allah loves not, aggressors," the renowned Muslim scholar
    concluded





    و كما قلت لك فالموقع الذي اوردت به من الردود ما يُخرس النصارى الصليبيين

    اضافة الى ان الشيخ يوسف استس يشرح كل هذا بتفصيل في الفيديو الذي وضعت في المداخلة السابقة

    ان كانت هناك نقطة اختاه لم تتضح و لم يتم الرد عليها فأخبرينا بها
    و جزاك الله خيرا
    Last edited by أسد الدين; 17-06-2007 at 12:56 PM.

  7. #7
    أم تسنيم's Avatar
    أم تسنيم is offline عضوة مميزة
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    250
    Last Activity
    29-11-2011
    At
    11:27 PM

    Default

    الاخوة الافاضل شكرا لكم وبارك الله فيكم

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5
    Last Activity
    13-02-2011
    At
    07:17 PM

    Default

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
    الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على سيدنا رسول الله
    أما بعد فيسعدني أن اعرض لكم موقعنا الذي فتح الله علينا بخدمته السنين الطوال
    وبه ترجمة إظهار الحق وكذا مقالات الآب عبد الأحد داوود
    فلا عن ترجمة الكثير من التراث من القرآن والحديث
    وكله وقفا لله مجانا

    http:/www.allah.com

    2. CHRISTIAN DIALOG
    The Rare Statements of Jesus
    Al Mahdi, Jesus & AntiChrist
    The articles of the bishop of Uramiah
    The great debate or revealing the truth
    The Crucifixion

    ثم عليكم بموسوعة مجمع الأحاديث والبحث الإسلامي الشامل
    حمل مجمع الأحاديث وموسوعة الحافظ عبد الله للبحث الإسلامي الشامل http://www.muhammad.com (مجمع الأحاديث) بركة جمع 50000 سنة من أعمال الرواة والحفاظ بركة الحافظ عبد الله حفظه الله ممن يريد يلونه شيعيا إثنا عشريا أو زيديا أو ..فهو إمام أهل السنة والجماعة فى عصره وهذه الموسوعة تختم شخصيته ببركة سنة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم التى أحياها - نبحث عن وكلاء توزيع مجانا بكل المدن والقرى info@muhammad.com ولا تنس أن تدعوا لشيخي أن يزيده الله عزا وكرامة كل يوم بقبره وأن يرحمنى ويرحمك معه والسلام
    نقره لتكبير أو تصغير الصورة ونقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة بحجمها الطبيعي

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,508
    Religion
    الإسلام
    Last Activity
    31-05-2016
    At
    01:33 AM

    Default

    بارك الله فيك اخينا ويسعدنا زيارتك

    ولكن فى الحقيقة المنتدى عندنا لا ينتهج غير عقيدة اهل السلف

    http://aslein.net/showthread.php?p=44696

    http://www.allah.com/docs/dorar.doc

    وجزاكم الله خيرا
    Last edited by شبكة بن مريم الإسلامية; 30-10-2007 at 08:11 PM.
    لا يتم الرد على الرسائل الخاصة المرسلة على هذا الحساب.

    أسئلكم الدعاء وأرجو ان يسامحني الجميع
    وجزاكم الله خيرا


I need an answer abut this Suspicion


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. في انتظار موافقة answer me muslims على مناظرة أسد الدين
    By _answer me muslims in forum منتدى المناظرات
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 15-12-2010, 08:42 AM
  2. answer me please
    By tamslamt in forum منتدى نصرانيات
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-11-2007, 08:29 AM
  3. answer
    By tamslamt in forum الرد على الأباطيل
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 24-10-2007, 07:59 PM
  4. سؤال al safer_3 و answer me muslims و كل نصارى المنتديات
    By ياسر الطيب in forum منتدى نصرانيات
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-08-2007, 12:05 AM
  5. answer about jesus christ and if he crucified
    By أبو ايمان in forum English Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-02-2007, 11:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

I need an answer abut this Suspicion

I need an answer abut this Suspicion