اقتباسالمشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة الحق الحق
رمتني بدائها و انسلت
الحمد لله الذي جعلنا من اتباع الحق اينما كان اما انتم قتصدقون كل ناعق ينعق في الكنيسة حتى قلتم ظهر نور المسيح هنا و الاخر يقول لا ظهر هناك و الثالث يقول راينا نور العذراء فوق كنيسة كذا كذا
نسال الله السلامة و نحمده على العقل
اما التاليف فكتبة الكتاب المقدس هم اكبر المؤلفين و باعترافهم:
(سفر المكابيين الثاني 15: 39) فَإِنْ كُنْتُ قَدْ أَحْسَنْتُ التَّأْلِيفَ وَأَصَبْتُ الْغَرَضَ فَذلِكَ مَا كُنْتُ أَتَمَنَّى، وَإِنْ كَانَ قَدْ لَحِقَنِي الْوَهَنُ وَالتَّقْصِيرُ فَإِنِّي قَدْ بَذَلْتُ وُسْعِي.
لا حول و لا قوة الا بالله الراجل بيالف في كتاب الله !!!!!
اولا لماذا يا مجدي رجائي تنتقي ما تشاء من الموضوع . الموضوع لم يتحدث عن موريس بوكاي فقط فلم اختصرت كلامك عنه؟؟؟؟
ثانيا بالمناسبة الرابط الثاني لا يعمل و الرابط الاول يا مجدي رجائي هو ويكيبيديا و ليس مصدر علمي و مع هذا فليس فيه الكلام الذي ذكرته
ثالثا : موريس بوكاي قيل فيه غير الذي نقلته هنا :
https://books.google.com.sa/books?id...TzLp1EA&edge=0
رابعا :
هذا الكلام الذي نقلته هو عبارة عن نسخ و لصق من منتديات الزريبة الذي بدوره تم نسخه و لصقه من هذا الموقع :
http://www.worldwizzy.com/library/Th...sm_of_Bucaille
و طبعا لا نعرف من كاتب هذا المقال و في نفس الوقت يقتبس مثل هذا الكلام و الاتهام من مواقع غير علمية و يطرح هنا في نقاشات علمية و كانه اصبح دليلا !!!!
خامسا : مثل هذا الكلام تم الرد عليه من فترة :
http://www.answering-christianity.co...ma_drowned.htm
و قد رد الاخوة في الغرب جزاهم الله خيرا على مزاعم الدكتور ويليام كامبل و استشهدو باحاث اخرى تؤكد ما قاله الدكتور موريس بوكاي :
However, our current author severely dislikes all Muslims and is bent on discovering "contradictions." The irony of the matter is that although he has no formal knowledge of these matters but manages to brand all of these statements to be "contradictory," in spite of that, when truly objective and unbiased Christian scholars who are world renown specialist in this field are presented with the very same verses and many more, and spend over three years studying them in detail, we find these world renown Christian scholars so totally amazed at their accuracy in matters which were only scientifically proven in the last twenty years that they found no recourse but to admit that it must have come from God and even to go so far as to suggest the total replacement of current scientific terminology with that used by God in the Qur'an. But they is saying this with regard to the Muslim Qur'an and not their own Christian Bible. Who are some of these men? Among them are Prof. Keith Moore, Prof. E. Marshall Johnson, Prof. Joe Leigh Simpson, Prof. T.V.N. Persaud , Dr. Maurice Bucaille, and Dr. Tejatet Tejasen to name but a few. Let us learn a little more about these men and then hear what they have to say in this regard:
Dr. Keith L. Moore is a Professor of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. He is a world renowned scientist and a distinguished researcher in the fields of anatomy and embryology, he has published more than 150 research articles, chapters and books in this field. He is the author of several medical textbooks, such as the widely used and acclaimed "The Developing Human: Clinically oriented Embryology" (now in its fifth edition, translated into eight different languages, and the standard textbook on this science in many countries), "Before We Are Born" and "Clinically Oriented Anatomy." He has also recently co-authored "Qur'an and Modern Science, Correlation Studies." Dr. Moore is the recipient of numerous awards and honors, including, in 1984, the J.C.B. Grant Award, which is the highest honor granted by the Canadian Association of Anatomists. He has served in many academic and administrative positions, including the President of the Canadian Association of Anatomists, 1968-1970. Let us see what Dr. Moore's opinion is on the scientific statements regarding embryology to be found in the Qur'an:
Dr. Moore was contacted by a Muslim scholar by the name of Abdul-Majeed Azzindani. He was asked to participate in a three-year study of around twenty-five verses of the Qur'an and the Sunnah (sayings of Muhammad, pbuh) which speak about embryology, and to determine the degree of their correspondence to modern scientific discoveries. Dr. Moore's conclusion regarding this matter was:
"For the past three years, I have worked with the Embryology Committee of King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, helping them to interpret the many statements in the Qur'an and the Sunnah referring to human reproduction and prenatal development. At first I was astonished by the accuracy of the statements that were recorded in the seventh century AD, before the science of embryology was established. Although I was aware of the glorious history of Muslim scientists in the 10th century AD, and of some of their contributions to Medicine, I new nothing about the religious facts and beliefs contained in the Qur'an and Sunnah. It is important for Islamic and other students to understand the meaning of these Qur'anic statements about human development, based on current scientific knowledge. The interpretations of the "verses" in the Qur'an and the Sunnah, translated by Shaikh Azzindani, are to the best of my knowledge accurate."
From the forward of "The Developing Human: Clinically oriented Embryology," third edition, by Dr. Keith L. Moore.
http://www.answering-christianity.co...htm#westernsci
فهذه بعض شهادات من علماء احياء اكدو فيها صحة كلام موريس بوكاي و صحة القران الكريم و السنة
فارجو منك يا اخ مجدي ان تكف عن النسخ و اللصق من اجل الجدال فقط و ان تركز على حوارك مع الدكتور احمد الالفي و مع السيف البتار و لا تنسى اننا لا زلنا ننتظر ان تكمل ردك على الدكتور احمد الالفي فردك ما زال غير مكتملا
رد مع اقتباس
المفضلات